Patna High Court

Jitendra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided: 16 April 2026
Disposal: WITHDRAWN
Bench: NANI TAGIA

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioners Jitendra Kumar and Maha Nand Paswan filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and several statutory bodies. The petitioners later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The learned counsel for the petitioners requested withdrawal, and the Court granted the permission. Consequently, the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were considered.

Issues considered

Whether the petitioners may be permitted to withdraw their civil writ petition

Subjects

withdrawal of petition
civil writ jurisdiction
Patna High Court

Judgment

                       IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16567 of 2021
                  ======================================================
            1.     Jitendra Kumar S/o Surendra Kumar Resident of Village- Purbi Nawada,
                   P.O.- Nawada, District- Bhojpur, Pin code- 802301.
            2.    Maha Nand Paswan S/o Jittan Paswan Resident of Village and P.O.-
                  Tirakharda, District- Araria, Pin code- 854331.
                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
            1.    The State of Bihar Through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
            2.    The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
            3.    The Bihar Technical Service Commission Through its Chairman, 19 Harding
                  Road, Patna.
            4.    The All India Council for Technical Education Through its Chairman,
                  Nelson Mandela Marg, Vasant Kunj, New Delhi- 110070.
            5.     Ministry of Human Resource Development Through the Principal Secretary,
                   Government of India.
                                                                      ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Abhinay Priyadarshi, Advocate
                                                Mr.Kriti Suman, Advocate
                  For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Nadim Seraj, GP- 5
                                                Ms. Shalini, AC to GP- 5
                                                Mr. A. Bahadur Mathur, CGC
                                                Mr. N. Kumar, Advocate
                                                Mr. Bijay Choubey, Advocate
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA
                                        ORAL ORDER

4    16-04-2026                   Learned counsel for the petitioners seek permission to

                    withdraw the present petition.

                                  2. Permission is granted.

                                  3. As such, the present petition is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.



                                               (Nani Tagia, J)
Siddharth
Sagar/-

U

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…