Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ram Khelawan YadavversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Holding

The writ application is dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

The petitioners, three brothers, filed a civil writ petition against the State of Bihar and several officials of the Bihar State Bridge Construction Corporation concerning land acquisition and bridge construction matters. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners, and the petitioners themselves did not appear, indicating a loss of interest in pursuing the writ. The respondents, including the State and the corporation's officials, were represented by counsel. The court noted the absence of prosecution by the petitioners. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ application for want of prosecution.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to prosecute a writ application?

Subjects

  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • non‑prosecution
  • dismissal
  • land acquisition
  • bridge construction

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16648 of 2022
                 ======================================================
           1.     Ram Khelawan Yadav, S/o Late Maujelal Yadav, R/V - Sakhawa, Anchal and
                  P.S.- Bithan, District - Samastipur.
           2.    Chet Narayan Yadav, S/o Late Maujelal Yadav, R/V - Sakhawa, Anchal and
                 P.S.- Bithan, District - Samastipur.
           3.    Prabhu Narayan Yadav, S/o Late Maujelal Yadav, R/V - Sakhawa, Anchal
                 and P.S.- Bithan, District - Samastipur.

                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Addl. Chief Secretary, Road Construction
                 Department Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Collector, Samastipur.
           3.    The District Land Acquisition Officer, Samastipur.
           4.    The Bihar State Bridge Construction Corporation Limited, 7 Sardar Patel
                 Marg, Patna through its Chairman.
           5.    The Chairman, the Bihar State Bridge Construction Corporation Limited, 7
                 Sardar Patel Marg, Patna.
           6.    The Secretary, the Bihar State Bridge Construction Corporation Limited, 7
                 Sardar Patel Marg, Patna.
           7.    The Senior Project Engineer, the Bihar State Bridge Construction
                 Corporation Limited, Work Division, Darbhanga.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :        None
                 For the State          :        Mr. Rajeev Shekhar, AC to GA-13
                 For the Respondent No.4 to 7:   Mr. Rabindra Kumar Priyadarsi, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOURENDRA PANDEY
                                       ORAL ORDER

7   24-04-2026                 Nobody appears on behalf of the petitioners.

                               2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   respondent nos.4 to 7, Bihar State Bridge Construction

                   Corporation Limited as well as learned AC to GA-13 for the

                   State are present.

                               3. Earlier, also, none had appeared on behalf of the
          Patna High Court CWJC No.16648 of 2022(7) dt.24-04-2026
                                                     2/2




                    petitioners. It seems that the petitioners had lost interest in the

                    present writ application.

                                4. The application stands dismissed for want of non-

                    prosecution.



                                            (Sourendra Pandey, J)
manoj/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.