Patna High Court

Raj Nath SinghversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

Decided: 6 January 2026
Disposal: WITHDRAWN
Bench: ANIL KUMAR SINHA

Holding

The court granted permission to withdraw the application and disposed of it.

Summary

Petitioner Raj Nath Singh filed an application before the Patna High Court seeking permission to withdraw his earlier application and to challenge the impugned order before the appropriate authority. The court considered whether it could grant such liberty to withdraw. After hearing arguments, the court held that permission could be granted. Accordingly, the court allowed the withdrawal and disposed of the application. No substantive merits of the original dispute were addressed.

Issues considered

Whether the court may grant permission to withdraw an application and allow the petitioner to challenge the impugned order before the appropriate authority.

Subjects

withdrawal of application
permission to withdraw
civil writ jurisdiction
high court order
procedural liberty

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16856 of 2016
                  ======================================================
                  Raj Nath Singh Son of Sri Raj Nandan Singh R/o Village and P.O.- Ular, P.S.-
                  Dulhin Bazar, Block- Dulhin Bazar, District- Patna.

                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
            1.    The State Of Bihar and Ors
            2.    The Secretary, Department of Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Patna.
            3.    The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Patna.
            4.    The Assistant Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Danapur, Patna.
            5.    The Centre Incharge Paddy procurement Block- Dulhin Bazar, District-
                  Patna.
            6.    The Patliputra Central Bank Dulhin Bazar Branch through its Branch
                  Manager, Dulhin Bazar, Patna.
            7.    The BCEO Dulhin Bazar, Patna.
            8.    The B.D.O. Dulhin Bazar, Patna.
            9.    Ular Sorampur PACS through its Chairman namely Smt. Pushpa Devi Wife
                  of Sri Chandra Mohan singh Village - Ular, P.O. - Bharatpura, P.s. Dulhin
                  Bazar, District- Patna, Bihar - 801102.
            10. Sri Kalyan Singh @ Sonu Kumar son of ................... R/o Village-
                P.S.- ........................ District- Patna, The Chairman Ular Sorampur PACS,
                Dulhin Bazar, Patna.
            11. The Suchitra Rice Mills Sailhauri Dulhinbazar, P.S.- Dulhin Bazar, Patna.
            12. Sri Kant Prasad son of Not Known, The Proprietor/Manager of the Suchitra
                Rice Mills Sailhauri Dulhinbazar, P.S.- Dul
            13. The Bihar State Food Corporation Patna.

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr.Indra Mohan Kumar
                  For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.Uday Shankar Sharan Singh-Gp19
                  For the BSFC           :      Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate
                  For Respondent No.10 :        Mr. Akash Deep, Advocate
                  For Respondent No. 11,12:     Mr. Braj Bhushan Mishra, Advocate
                                                Mr. Saurav Kumar Suman , Advocate
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
                                        ORAL ORDER

11   06-01-2026           1. After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner

                    seeks permission to withdraw this application with liberty to
           Patna High Court CWJC No.16856 of 2016(11) dt.06-01-2026
                                                      2/2




                     challenge the impugned order before appropriate authority in

                     accordance with law.

                           2. Permission is granted.

                           3. Accordingly, this application is disposed with the

                     aforesaid liberty.



                                             (Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
praful/-

U

Continue reading with your account

Checking your session…