Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ram Sagar Prasad Singh and AnrversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The petition was dismissed as withdrawn, and no writ was issued.

Summary

Petitioners Ram Sagar Prasad Singh and Tara Devi filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Bihar and its officials to reopen a ceiling proceeding against Mahanth Ramjeevan Das and to denotify seven kathas of land that had been declared surplus in the Begusarai district Gazette. The petition alleged that the land, identified by specific Khata and Khesra numbers, should be restored to the petitioners. The petition was later withdrawn on the instructions of the petitioner's counsel, Mr. Mritunjay Kumar. Consequently, the Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Court can issue a writ of mandamus ordering the reopening of a ceiling proceeding and denotification of surplus land.

Subjects

  • writ of mandamus
  • ceiling proceeding
  • land denotification
  • surplus land
  • petition withdrawn

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1702 of 2017
                 ======================================================
           1.     Ram Sagar Prasad Singh son of Late Ram Khelawan Singh
           2.    Tara Devi Wife of Ram Sagar Prasad Singh Both are residents of Sarvodaya
                 Nagar, Police Station - Town Begusarai, District - Begusarai.

                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus
           1.    The State Of Bihar
           2.    The Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land Reforms Department,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The District Magistrate, Begusarai.
           4.    The Circle Officer, Begusarai, District - Begusarai.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s     :      Mr. Mritunjay Kumar, Advocate
                 For the State            :      Mrs. Nutan Sahay, AC to AAG-12
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   12-01-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                 2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   grant of following relief(s):

                                                 “for issuance of a writ in the nature of

                                        writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ,

                                        order or direction commanding the respondents

                                        to reopen the ceiling proceeding concluded

                                        against one Mahanth Ramjeevan Das and

                                        denotify 7 kathas of land of petitioners

                                        pertaining to Khata No. 9, Khesra No. 1291 and

                                        1292 under Thana No. 342 of Mauza-Mirzapur
            Patna High Court CWJC No.1702 of 2017(2) dt.12-01-2026
                                                        2/2




                                         Bandura, Ward No. 22 within the municipal area

                                         of Begusarai which has been declared as surplus

                                         land and notified in Begusarai District Gazette

                                         Notification         no.1/90-91   dated   16.08.1990

                                         published on 09.09.1990 by respondent no. 3.”


                                  3. Mr. Vibhuti Kumar on the instruction of the Mr.

                      Mritunjay Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for

                      withdrawal of the petition.

                                  4. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as

                      withdrawn.



                                                    (Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.