Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Bhola MahtoversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The petition is allowed, directing the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority/competent court for redress of his grievance.

Summary

Bhola Mahto filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking a direction that the District Magistrate‑Collector refer his grievance to the Land Acquisition Rehabilitation Authority (LARA), Gaya under section 64(1) of the RTFCLARR Act, 2013 and that LARA dispose of it within the period prescribed under section 60(4). The petitioner’s counsel argued that the appropriate authority should be approached for redress, and the State’s counsel raised no objection. The Court, after hearing, allowed the petition, directing the petitioner to approach the competent authority or court for relief. It further noted that if a fresh petition is filed within eight weeks, it will be dealt with expeditiously. The order essentially disposes of the writ petition by permitting the petitioner to seek redress from the appropriate authority.

Issues considered

  • Whether the High Court can direct the District Magistrate‑Collector to refer the petitioner's grievance to LARA under section 64(1) of the RTFCLARR Act, 2013
  • Whether the petitioner should be allowed to approach the appropriate authority for redress of his grievance

Subjects

  • writ jurisdiction
  • land acquisition
  • RTFCLARR Act
  • section 64(1)
  • section 60(4)
  • Bihar

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17547 of 2023
                 ======================================================
                 Bhola Mahto Son of Ramlakhan Mahto, Resident of Village- Kushwaha
                 Nagar, Dhundhua, Khudha, P.S.- NTPC Khaira, District-Aurangabad (Bihar).

                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar Through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue
                 and Land Reform, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Director, Directorate of Land Acquisition, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The District Magistrate -cum- Collector, Aurangabad.
           4.    The District Land Acquisition Officer, Aurangabad.
           5.    The Chief Executive Officer, Bhartiya Rail Bijlee Company Ltd. (A Joint
                 Venture of India Railway and NTPC) its office located at the campus of
                 BRBCL Khaira, P.S.- NTPC, Khaira Circle Nabinagar, District- Aurangabad.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :        Mr.Vyas Kumar Mishra, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :        Mr.Birendra Prasad Singh, AC to SC-19
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-03-2026                   Heard Mr. Vyas Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for

                   the petitioner and the State.

                               2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   following relief/s:

                                            (i) for direction to the authority concerned

                                            particularly to Respondent No.-3 to refer the

                                            matter before LARA, Gaya under section

                                            64(1) of the RTFCLARR Act, 2013 on the

                                            application being filed by the petitioner on

                                            merit and the LARA, Gaya be directed to

                                            dispose the same within stipulated period as
         Patna High Court CWJC No.17547 of 2023(2) dt.24-03-2026
                                                    2/2




                                           per Section 60(4) of the RTFCLARR Act,

                                           2013.

                                3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he

                   shall be approaching the appropriate authority for the redressal

                   of the grievance.

                                4. Learned State counsel has no objection to it.

                                5. In that background, the writ petition is disposed of

                   allowing       the    petitioner       to   approach   the   appropriate

                   authority/competent Court for the redressal of the grievance.

                               6. Needless to add, if such petition is preferred in next

                   eight weeks, the same shall be taken to its logical conclusion at

                   an earliest.



                                                 (Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.