Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mustaque AlamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court disposed of the writ petition without adjudicating the merits, granting the petitioner liberty to seek alternative remedies.

Summary

The petitioner, Mustaque Alam, filed a writ petition seeking the quashing of Notification No. 2960 dated 03.11.1993, which declared certain lands as surplus, and requested that these lands be excluded from the surplus column in the Purnea district land ceiling case. He also sought directions to prevent the distribution of the lands to strangers and to protect his possession. The respondent State authorities opposed the reliefs. After hearing counsel, the petitioner indicated an intention to pursue an alternative remedy. The court, without addressing the merits, granted the petitioner liberty to explore other remedies and disposed of the writ petition.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition for quashing Notification No. 2960 is maintainable.
  • Whether the court can direct exclusion of the lands from the surplus column in the land ceiling case.
  • Whether the court can restrain the distribution of the lands to strangers and protect the petitioner's possession.

Subjects

  • land acquisition
  • surplus land
  • land ceiling
  • writ petition
  • quashing notification
  • property rights

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17727 of 2019
                 ======================================================
                 Mustaque Alam Son of Late Mahbub Alam Resident of Village- Kayami, P.S.-
                 Kasba, District- Purnea.

                                                                                  ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar Through the Collector, Purnea.
           2.    The Additional Collector (Ceiling) Purnea.
           3.    The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Sadar, Purnea.
           4.    The Anchal Adhikari Kasba, Purnea.
           5.    Madan Chand @ Chandra Shekhar Son of Late- Chunni Lal Sah Resident of
                 Village- Madarghat, P.S.- Kasba, District- Purnea.
           6.    Md. Idrish Son of Late- Md. Siddique Resident of Mohalla- Kasab Tola,
                 Line Bazar, P.S.- K. Hat, District- Purnea.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :         Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, Adv.
                 For the Respondent/s   :         Mr. Sajid Salim Khan ( Sc25 )
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   07-01-2026                   Heard Mr. Amit Kumar Anand, learned counsel for

                   the petitioner and the State.

                               2. The present application has been preferred for the

                   following relief(s):

                                                       (i) For quashing the Notification
                                            No. 2960 dated- 03.11.1993 published in
                                            Purnea district gazette issue No. 36 dated-
                                            09.11.1993 at Annexure- 1 so far it relates to
                                            acquisition of the lands in Question as
                                            surplus.
                                                       (ii) For issuance of a direction to
                                            the   government       respondents        authorities
           Patna High Court CWJC No.17727 of 2019(3) dt.07-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                                            specially the respondent No.1 and 2 for
                                            exclusion of the lands in Question from the
                                            column of surplus lands in Purnea district
                                            Land Ceiling Case No. 09 of 1973-74 (State
                                            Versus Chunni Lal Sah).
                                                         (iii) For issuance of a further
                                            direction to the respondents authorities for
                                            not distributing the lands in question to
                                            strangers and for not taking action for
                                            dispossessing the petitioners there from.
                                                         (iv) For any other relief or reliefs
                                            as deemed fit and proper in the interest of
                                            justice.
                                 3. After some argument, learned counsel for the

                     petitioner submits that he shall be exploring alternate remedy in

                     the matter.

                                 4. Granting said liberty and without commenting on

                     the merit of the case, the writ petition is disposed of.



                                                   (Rajiv Roy, J)
Vijay Singh/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.