Patna High Court
NandlalversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- ALOK KUMAR SINHA
Holding
The petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
Nandlal, a resident of Uttar Pradesh, filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar, the Bihar State University Service Commission, and its officials. The petition sought relief against the respondents but no substantive grounds were argued in the record. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the petitioner wished to withdraw the writ application. The court, noting the petitioner's instruction, proceeded to dismiss the case on the basis of withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was closed without any substantive adjudication on the merits.
Subjects
- withdrawal
- writ petition
- civil procedure
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17881 of 2025
======================================================
Nandlal Son of Hem Raj, resident of village- Kandhiya, P.O. Bahauddinpur,
P.S.- Pawai, District-Ajamgarh, State-Uttar Pradesh.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of
Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Bihar State University Service Commission through its Chairman,
through its Chairman, 8th floor, Bihar School Examination Board, Academic
Building, Budh Marg, Patna-01.
3. The Secretary, Bihar State University Service Commission, 8th floor, Bihar
School Examination Board, Academic Building, Budh Marg, Patna-01.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Prasad, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Binod Kumar Yadav, SC-18
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER
3 27-04-2026 Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for
Bihar State University Service Commission and learned counsel
for the respondents-State are present.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Umesh
Prasad submits that he is under instruction to withdraw the
present writ application.
3. As prayed for, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
Prakash Narayan
/-
U
Checking your session…