Patna High Court
Vijay Kumar PatelversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
Holding
The Court granted liberty to the petitioner to file an appeal under Section 92 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, and ordered the appellate authority to consider the appeal on merits without being impeded by limitation.
Summary
Vijay Kumar Patel filed a writ petition in the Patna High Court seeking to set aside an order dated 30 June 2025 passed by the Sub‑Divisional Magistrate, Mohania, which directed the confiscation of his vehicle (registration No. UP65CN1645) under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act. The petitioner requested liberty to file an appeal under Section 92 of the same Act, arguing that the order should be reviewed on its merits. The Court examined whether the petitioner could be permitted to file such an appeal despite any limitation concerns. The Bench granted the petitioner's request, allowing him to file the appeal within three weeks and directing the appellate authority to decide the matter on merits within six weeks, without being barred by limitation. The Court also ordered that a reasoned speaking order be issued by the appellate authority. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of after granting the liberty to appeal.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner is entitled to liberty to file an appeal under Section 92 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 against the confiscation order.
- Whether the limitation period can be condoned for filing the appeal.
Legislation cited
Subjects
- writ jurisdiction
- vehicle confiscation
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act
- Section 92 appeal
- limitation
- liberty to appeal
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.180 of 2026
======================================================
Vijay Kumar Patel S/o Mataru Lal, R/o Karnadadi, PS Bhelupur, Distict
Varanasi (U.P).
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner, Excise Dept Patna.
2. The District Magistrate cum Collector, Kaimur at Bhabua.
3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Kaimur at Bhabua.
4. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Mohania (Kaimur).
5. The Superintendent of Police, Kaimur at Bhabua.
6. The Superintendent of Excise Department, Kaimur at Bhabua.
7. The Station Head of Durgawati Police Station, Kaimur at Bhabua.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Tribhuwan Narayan, ADv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Addl. Advocate General (07)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)
2 19-01-2026 Though the present writ petition has been filed for setting
aside the order dated 30.6.2025, passed by the learned Sub-
Divisional Magistrate, Mohania (Kaimur) in Excise (Vehicle
Confiscation) Case No. 41 of 2025, whereby and whereunder
the learned Collector has passed an order for confiscation of the
vehicle bearing registration no. UP65CN1645, however at the
outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty on
behalf of the petitioner to challenge the said order dated
30.6.2025, passed by the learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate,
Patna High Court CWJC No.180 of 2026(2) dt.19-01-2026
2/2
Mohania (Kaimur), by filing appropriate appeal under Section
92 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.
2. Accordingly, we deem it fit and proper to grant liberty to
the petitioner to file appropriate appeal under Section 92 of the
Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 and in case such an
appeal is filed within a period of three weeks from today, the
appellate authority shall consider the same on merits, without
being impeded by the issue of limitation and pass a reasoned
and a speaking order, in accordance with law, within a period of
six weeks, thereafter.
3. The present writ petition stands disposed off.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
( Praveen Kumar, J)
Ajay/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.