Patna High Court
M/s Shristi Developers Pvt Ltd.versusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
Holding
The petition is disposed conditionally, requiring the petitioner to file refund applications within three weeks and the respondents to decide them within four weeks, without granting mandamus.
Summary
M/s Shristi Developers Pvt Ltd filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus directing the State of Bihar and its commercial tax officials to refund excess VAT of Rs.45,76,865 paid for assessment years 2007-08 to 2010-11, with interest. The respondents argued that under the Bihar Settlement of Tax Disputes Act, 2024 the petitioner had already settled dues for 2011-12 and had not filed the required refund applications for the earlier years. The petitioner contended it would file refund applications under Rule 43 of the Bihar VAT Rules, 2005 within three weeks. The court held that the petition would be disposed conditionally, directing the petitioner to file the applications within three weeks and the respondents to consider and dispose them within four weeks. Accordingly, the writ petition was disposed without granting the relief sought.
Issues considered
- Whether the court can issue a mandamus directing refund of excess VAT without the petitioner filing a refund application under Rule 43 of the Bihar VAT Rules, 2005.
- Effect of the Bihar Settlement of Tax Disputes Act, 2024 on the petitioner's right to claim refund for assessment years 2007-08 to 2010-11.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Settlement of Tax Disputes Act, 2024
- Bihar Value Added Tax, 2005
- Companies Act, 1956
Subjects
- VAT refund
- mandamus
- tax dispute settlement
- Bihar VAT Act
- Rule 43
- writ petition
- commercial taxes
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18129 of 2025
======================================================
M/s Shristi Developers Pvt Ltd. a company incorporated under the Companies
Act, 1956, having its registered office at Noorpur, Katra Bazar Samiti, Patna,
District Patna through its Director, Santosh Kumar, S/o Ram Prit Singh, R/o-
Bazar Samiti, Patna-800008.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Commercial Taxes
Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Commercial Taxes Department,
Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Joint Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Administration),
Commercial Taxes Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes, Patna City East Circle,
Commercial Taxes Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raju Prasad, Adv.
Ms. Nupur Anand, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Government Pleader (07)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH)
2 08-07-2026 The present writ petition has been filed seeking the
following reliefs:-
“a. For issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/ order(s)/
direction(s), preferably in the nature of mandamus,
commanding the Respondents to refund the excess amount of
tax amounting to Rs.45,76,865/- paid by the petitioner
towards Value Added Tax (VAT) for the assessment years:
2007-08, 2008-09, 2009-10 and 2010-11 along with
applicable interest under the provisions of the Bihar Value
Added Tax, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as the "Act"), which
Patna High Court CWJC No.18129 of 2025(2) dt.08-07-2026
2/3
has attained finality after finalization of assessment and
subsequent proceedings.”
2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the
respondents has submitted by referring to paragraph no.13 of the
counter affidavit filed in the present case that after the
promulgation of Bihar Settlement of Tax Disputes Act, 2024, the
petitioner had filed a petition for settlement of his assessed dues
for the financial year 2011-12 and the settlement was also
undertaken on 11.09.2024 for the said financial year, however,
though the petitioner became eligible to file fresh refund
application in form A-VII for 2007-08 to 2010-11 but no refund
application has been filed.
3. In reply to the aforesaid, the learned counsel for
the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be filing refund
applications for the financial years 2007-08 to 2010-11 in terms
of Rule 43 of the Bihar Value Added Tax Rules, 2005 within a
period of three weeks from today.
4. Per contra, the learned counsel for the respondents
submits that in case appropriate applications are filed by the
petitioner under Rule 43 of the Bihar Value Added Tax Rules,
2005 within a period of three weeks from today, the same would
definitely be considered on merits and disposed of within a
period of four weeks, thereafter. It is directed, accordingly.
Patna High Court CWJC No.18129 of 2025(2) dt.08-07-2026
3/3
5. The present writ petition stands disposed of on the
aforesaid terms.
(Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
(Raj Kumar, J)
kanchan/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.