Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shiv Nandan Prasad JaiswalversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Holding

The petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.

Summary

Shiv Nandan Prasad Jaiswal filed a writ petition seeking compensation for a 0.32 decimal parcel of land (Khata No.598, Khesra No.50) that was acquired by the Government of Bihar in 2007 for the Trimuhani Kursela Tatbandh project. The petitioner also requested that the compensation be paid at a commercial rate with 18% annual interest, along with costs of litigation. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner, while the State was represented. The High Court observed that the petition had not been prosecuted and consequently dismissed it for want of prosecution. No substantive adjudication on the compensation or interest claims was made.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to compensation for the land acquired in 2007
  • Whether compensation should be payable at a commercial rate with 18% per annum interest
  • Whether costs of litigation can be awarded to the petitioner

Subjects

  • land acquisition
  • compensation
  • interest
  • litigation costs
  • want of prosecution
  • civil writ jurisdiction

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18159 of 2019
                 ======================================================
                 Shiv Nandan Prasad Jaiswal S/o Late Manohar Bhagat @ Late Manohar
                 Prasad Jaiswal Vill.- Sadhua, P.s.- Rangra (Gopalpur), Distt.- Bhagalpur

                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                  Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land
                 Reforms Department, Bihar, Patna
           2.    The Principal Secretary Revenue and Land Reforms Department, Bihar,
                 Patna
           3.    The Collector Bhagalpur, Distt.- Bhagalpur
           4.    The Collector Saharsa, Distt.- Saharsa
           5.    The District Land Acquisition Officer Camp-Naugachhia, Distt.- Bhagalpur
           6.    The Special Land Acquistion Officer Koshi Yojna Saharsa, Distt.- Saharsa
           7.    The Additional Collector (Lok Shikayat Niwaran) cum District Lok Shikayat
                 Nivaran Officer Saharsa, Distt.- Saharsa
           8.    The Anchal Adhikari Thana Bihpur, Distt.- Bhagalpur

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :        None
                 For the Respondent/s   :        Mr. Md.Khurshid Alam (Aag12)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   07-01-2026                   No one appears on behalf of the petitioner though State

                   is present.

                                 2. The present application has been preferred for the

                   following relief(s):

                                                     (i) For direction to make payment
                                            of the compensation of the land of the
                                            petitioner bearing Khata No.598, Khesra
                                            No.50, Bhuarjan no.10 for total area 0.32
                                            decimal which has been acquired by Govt. in
                                            the year 2007 for construction of Trimuhani
           Patna High Court CWJC No.18159 of 2019(3) dt.07-01-2026
                                                      2/2




                                            Kursela Tatbandh and all procedure has
                                            been completed and land has been acquired
                                            and Trimuhani Kursela Tatbandh has been
                                            made but amount of compensation the said
                                            acquired land has not paid till date to the
                                            petitioner       or      his   ancestors   where
                                            construction of Trimuhani Kursela Tatbandh
                                            has been made over the petitioner's land in
                                            question.
                                                         (ii) For further direction to make
                                            the compensation of land as a Commercial
                                            rate with 18% inte-rest per annum and
                                            petitioner has filed several representa-tion
                                            before the authorities which is pending till
                                            today.
                                                         (iii) For direction to pay the cost
                                            of litigation to the petitioner.
                                                         (iv) For other any relief or reliefs
                                            for which the petition-er is found fit and
                                            proper in the facts and circumstances of the
                                            case.
                                 3. For want of prosecution, dismissed.



                                                    (Rajiv Roy, J)
Vijay Singh/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.