Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Lapat RamversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

Decided
Disposal
DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Holding

The petition was dismissed for non‑prosecution as the petitioner failed to appear before the court.

Summary

Lapat Ram filed a civil writ petition seeking two increments, proper pension, correction of the 3rd ACP amount, release of Rs.1,54,522 adjusted from his retiral benefit, and 18% penal interest. The petition listed the State of Bihar and several officials as respondents. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioner on the hearing dates, including a prior date of 21.11.2024. Consequently, the Hon'ble Justice Partha Sarthy dismissed the petition for non‑prosecution. The dismissal was without any substantive consideration of the merits of the reliefs claimed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petition for increments, pension correction, and other monetary reliefs is maintainable in the absence of the petitioner’s appearance
  • Whether the court can grant the reliefs sought when the petitioner fails to prosecute the petition

Subjects

  • pension
  • increment
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • non‑prosecution
  • petition dismissal
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1842 of 2017
                 ======================================================
                 Lapat Ram Son of Late Jhagaru Ram, Resident of Village- Bagahi Deoraj,
                 Police Station- Lauriya, District- West Champaran.

                                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Home Department,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The Director General of Police, Special Branch, Government of Bihar,
                 Patna.
           4.    The Additional Director General of Police, Special Branch, Government of
                 Bihar, Patna.
           5.    The Inspector General of Police, Tirhut Range, Muzaffarpur, Bihar.
           6.    The Accountant General, Bihar, Patna.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :         None
                 For the State          :         Mr. Manish Kumar, GP- 4
                 For the AG             :         Mr. Ram Kinkar Chaubey, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   05-01-2026                   No one appears for the petitioner. Learned counsel for

                   the respondents is present.

                                 2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for

                   the following reliefs:

                                                       “(a) To grant two increments as
                                            per office D.O. No.390 of 1985 to the
                                            petitioner and accordingly fix the pension of
                                            the petitioner.
                                                       (b) To grant Proper amount of 3rd
                                            ACP wherein Rs. 4800/- has been given to
                                            the petitioner instead of Rs.5400/-
           Patna High Court CWJC No.1842 of 2017(4) dt.05-01-2026
                                                       2/2




                                                          (c)   To   direct   the   respondent
                                             authorities to release Rs. 1,54,522/- which
                                             has been adjusted from the retiral benefit of
                                             the petitioner.
                                                          (d) To pay the 18% penal interest
                                             over the entire dues payable to the petitioner.
                                                          (e) To any other relief/ reliefs
                                             which the petitioner is found entitled in the
                                             facts and circumstances of the case.”

                                 3. No one appeared on behalf of the petitioner on

                     21.11.2024 also.

                                 4. The case is dismissed for non-prosecution.



                                                (Partha Sarthy, J)
sauravkrsinha/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.