Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Arvind Kumar ChaudharyversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Arvind Kumar Chaudhary filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court against several officials of the Bihar Department of Minor Water Resources. During the pendency of the petition, the petitioner’s grievance was settled. The petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the writ application. The Court, after hearing both sides, granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the writ petition after the grievance has been settled

Subjects

  • withdrawal
  • writ petition
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • High Court
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18531 of 2023
                  ======================================================
                  Arvind Kumar Chaudhary Son of Shree Sudhir Chaudhary Resident of
                  Village Pipradih PS-Rajaun, District- Banka
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus

             1.   The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of
                  Minor Water Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna.
             2.   The Deputy Secretary, Department of Minor Water Resources, Government
                  of Bihar, Patna.
             3.   The Chief Engineer, Department of Minor Irrigation, Muzaffarpur.
             4.   The Superintending Engineer, Minor irrigation Circle, Muzaffarpur.
             5.    The Executive Engineer, Minor irrigation Division, Muzaffarpur.
                                                                          ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr. Rakesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate
                  For the Respondent/s   :       Mr. Standing Counsel (9)
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                        ORAL ORDER

2   21-01-2026                  Learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel

                    for the State are present.

                                2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                    during pendency of the writ petition, the grievance of the

                    petitioner has already been settled.              As such, he seeks

                    permission to withdraw this application.

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                                4. This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                                 (Dr. Anshuman, J)
    Mkr./-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.