Patna High Court
Chitranjan SharmaversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- RITESH KUMAR
Holding
The petition was dismissed as infructuous because the grievance had been redressed.
Summary
The petitioner, Chitranjan Sharma, filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and several officials of the Road Construction Department, alleging a grievance related to road works. The petitioner’s counsel informed the court that the grievance had been satisfactorily redressed. On that basis, the counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous. The court examined the submission and found no reason to continue the proceedings. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as infructuous.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition should be dismissed on the ground that the petitioner’s grievance has been redressed and the petition has become infructuous
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- dismissal
- civil writ jurisdiction
- road construction grievance
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18592 of 2023
======================================================
Chitranjan Sharma Son of Late Nathuni Sharma Resident of Mohalla-Near
Bulla Shahid, Lakhibag, Manpur, Police Station-Muffasil, District-Gaya.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Road
Construction Department of Bihar, Visheshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road,
Patna.
2. The Additional Chief Secretary, Road Construction Department of Bihar,
Visheshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
3. The Additional Secretary, Road Construction Department of Bihar,
Visheshwaraiya Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
4. The Engineer-in-Chief, Road Construction Department Govt. of Bihar,
Patna.
5. The Deputy Secretary, Road Construction Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vipin Kmar Singh, Advocate
: Mr. Manish Prakash, Advocate
For the State : Mr. Shiv Kumar, AC to GA-3
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 13-02-2026 Heard the parties.
2. Learned counsel Mr. Vipin Kumar Singh, appearing
on behalf of Mr. Manish Prakash, learned counsel for the
petitioner, submits that he has received instructions that the
grievance of the petitioner has been redressed. Therefore, the
writ petition has become infructuous.
3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed
as having become infructuous.
(Ritesh Kumar, J)
AjayMishra/-
U
Checking your session…