Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ekta SinghversusThe State Bank of India

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Ekta Singh filed a writ petition challenging the freezing of her bank account by State Bank of India, allegedly at the direction of cyber crime police, claiming undue mental harassment. The petitioner later informed the court that the account had been defreezed and sought permission to withdraw the petition while reserving the right to pursue other remedies. The court granted permission to withdraw the writ petition. Consequently, the petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the dispute were adjudicated.

Subjects

  • account freezing
  • bank
  • cyber crime
  • writ petition
  • mental harassment
  • withdrawal of petition

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18846 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Ekta Singh wife of Ajit Kumar Singh, resident of near Shiv Mandir, Shahar
                 Chapra, PO.- Sahar Chapra, P.S. -Derni, District Saran.

                                                                          ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The State Bank of India through its Chairman, State Bank Bhaan, Madame
                 Cama Road, Nariman Point, Mumbai.
           2.    The Deputy General Manager, State Bank of India, Administrative Office at
                 Poddar Complex, 2nd floor nearby the road, Mithanpura, Muzaffarpur.
           3.    The Additional General Manager, State Bank of India, Administrative Office
                 at Poddar Complex, 2nd floor nearby the road, Mithanpura, Muzaffarpur.
           4.    The Branch Manager, Branch ADB, State Bank of India, Taraiya, Saran.
           5.    The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Patna
           6.    The Director General of Police, State Cyber Crime, CIB Crime, 7th Floor,
                 C-Wing, Block II, KaramyodiBhawan, Sector-10A, Gandhi Nagar, Gujrat

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s      :    Mr. Sanjay Kumar Verma, Adv.
                                                Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Adv.
                 For the Respondent/s      :    Mr. Government Pleader (05)
                 For the SBI               :    Mr. Rakesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
                 For the State             :    Mr. Nalin Singh, Adv.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   22-01-2026                          Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

                   petitioner submits that the account of the petitioner has been

                   defreezed and therefore the cause in the present writ petition

                   does not survive. Further, the learned counsel has stated that the

                   petitioner has been put to undue mental harassment due to the

                   freezing of the account by the bank at the behest of the Cyber

                   Crime Police.

                                 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission
             Patna High Court CWJC No.18846 of 2025(3) dt.22-01-2026
                                                        2/2




                       to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to avail the

                       alternative remedies as available to him under the law if he has

                       any grievance against the respondent Bank or the Cyber Crime

                       Police.

                                   3. Permission is granted.

                                   4. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with

                       the aforesaid liberty.



                                              (A. Abhishek Reddy , J)
Gauravkr/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.