Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mohan RamversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court held that the Circle Officer’s no‑objection letter must remain in abeyance pending the decision of the Jamabandi cancellation case, and therefore the writ petition was disposed of.

Summary

The petitioner, Mohan Ram, claimed ownership of 1 acre of land in Mauza Dharahara Khurd based on a 1985-86 settlement parwana and challenged a July 2025 letter issued by the Circle Officer that gave a no‑objection certificate to the District Cooperative Officer for constructing a PACS godown on the same land. He sought certiorari to quash that letter, an order of the Sub‑Divisional Public Grievance Redressal Authority directing him to approach the Additional Collector, and injunctions restraining respondents from dispossessing him. The State respondents argued that the petitioner’s title was obtained by suppression of facts and that a Jamabandi cancellation case had already been filed, rendering the land title contestable. The Court observed that the cancellation proceedings before the Additional Collector must be decided before any further action, and therefore the Circle Officer’s no‑objection letter should remain in abeyance. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of without granting any relief, pending the outcome of the Jamabandi cancellation case.

Issues considered

  • Whether the Circle Officer’s issuance of a no‑objection certificate for construction on the petitioner’s land is valid.
  • Whether the writ petition seeking certiorari to quash Letter No. 744 and the public grievance authority’s order should be entertained.
  • Whether the pending Jamabandi cancellation proceedings bar the grant of the reliefs claimed by the petitioner.

Subjects

  • land settlement
  • jamabandi cancellation
  • certiorari
  • cooperative society
  • public grievance redressal
  • property rights
  • administrative law
  • Bihar

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19248 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Mohan Ram Son of Late Gajo Ram @ Jago Ravidas Resident of village-
                 Dharahara Khurd, Post Office- Charokhari Garh, P.S.- Fatehpur, District-
                 Gaya.

                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue
                 and Land Reforms, Patna.
           2.    The Principal Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms, Patna.
           3.    The Principal Secretary, Department of Cooperative, Government of Bihar,
                 Patna.
           4.    The Registrar, Department of Cooperative, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           5.    The Collector cum District Magistrate, Gaya Jee.
           6.    The District Cooperative Officer, Gaya Jee.
           7.    The Additional Collector cum Additional District Magistrate, Gaya jee.
           8.    The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Gaya Jee.
           9.    The Sub Divisional Officer, Gaya Jee.
           10. The Sub Divisional Public Grievance Redressal Authority, Gaya Jee.
           11. The Circle Officer, Fatehpur Circle, District Gaya Jee.
           12. The Circle Inspector, Fatehpur Circle, District Gaya Jee.
           13. The Anchal Amin, Fatehpur Circle, District Gaya Jee.
           14. The Chairman, PACS, Dharahara Kala Gram Panchayat Samiti, Fatehpur,
               District Gaya Jee.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr. Siya Ram Shahi, Adv.
                                                Mr. Om Prakash Maharaj, Adv.
                 For the Respondent/s   :       Mr. Subodh Kumar, AC to SC-26
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

5   21-04-2026                    Heard the parties.

                                         I.A. No. 02 of 2026

                                 2. The aforesaid I.A. has been preferred for seeking

                   amendment in the main writ application bringing on the record the
Patna High Court CWJC No.19248 of 2025(5) dt.21-04-2026
                                           2/5




          proposal of Jamabandi cancellation No. 2 dated 09.12.2025

          forwarded by Letter N. 1337 dated 09.12.2025 under the signature

          of C.O. Fatehpur Gaya as well as the order sheet of Jamabandi

          Cancellation Case No. 405/2025 -26.

                      3. In view of the facts that are part of the writ petition,

          learned State Counsel has no objection.

                      4. I.A. No. 02 of 2026 is allowed.

                      5. Let the amendment be part of the main writ petition.

                                  CWJC No. 19248 of 2025

                      6. Heard the parties.

                      7. The present application has been preferred for the

          following relief(s):

                                              (i) For issuance of an appropriate
                                 writ in the nature of Certiorari in quashing the
                                 Letter No. 744 dated 01.07.2025 as contained
                                 in Annexure P/9 issued by the Circle Officer,
                                 Fatehpur (Gaya) whereby and where under no
                                 objection Certificate has been issued in
                                 respect of the land under Parwana of the
                                 petitioner pertaining to Mauza Dharahara
                                 Khurd Khata No. 98 Khesara No. 412 Area 1
                                 Acre to the District Cooperative Officer, Gaya
                                 enabling him to construct a PACS Godown
                                 over 30 decimal out of 1 Acre of the land
                                 under the PACS Chairman of Dharahara
                                 Kalan      Gram          Panchayat   Samiti   under
                                 Fatehpur Anchal.
Patna High Court CWJC No.19248 of 2025(5) dt.21-04-2026
                                           3/5




                                              (ii) For issuance of a writ of
                                 Certiorari in quashing the order dated
                                 12.09.2025 passed in Public Complaint No.
                                 9999901180825569309 by the Sub Divisional
                                 Public Grievance Redressal Authority Gaya as
                                 contained in Annexure P/14 whereby the
                                 petitioner's Complaint has been disposed off
                                 with a direction to the petitioner to approach
                                 the Court of Additional Collector, Gaya where
                                 a process of cancellation of the Jamabandi of
                                 the petitioner in respect of the land in question
                                 is    going      to      be   initiated   after   the
                                 recommendation           by   the   Circle   Officer,
                                 Fatehpur Circle, vide his Letter No. 950 dated
                                 13.08.2025.
                                              (iii) For issuance of an appropriate
                                 writ /writs directing the respondent Nos. 4, 5,
                                 6 and 11 to restrain respondent No. 14 or else
                                 one from dispossessing the petitioner from the
                                 land which has been settled vide Parwana No.
                                 756 in settlement case No. 115 of 198586 in
                                 pursuant to 1 Acre of land of Mauza
                                 Dharahara Khurd Khata No. 98 Khasara No.
                                 412 and if he is dispossessed from the land in
                                 question his possession be restored.
                                              (iv) For issuance of any other relief/
                                 reliefs for which the petitioner is found entitled
                                 to under the facts and circumstances of the
                                 case.
                      8. The admitted facts of the case is/are that with respect

          to the land in question, a land settlement parwana was issued in the
Patna High Court CWJC No.19248 of 2025(5) dt.21-04-2026
                                            4/5




          year 1985-86 (Annexure- P/1 to the petition).

                      9. The petitioner is enjoying the fruits of the said land

          but was aggrieved when a letter no. 744 dated 01.07.2025 was

          issued by the Circle Officer, Fatehpur, Gaya to the District Co-

          operative Officer, Gaya giving no objection for the construction of

          a godown which included the land of the petitioner (Annexure- P/9

          to the petition).

                      10. Aggrieved, the present petition.

                      11. The counter affidavit has come on behalf of the

          State respondents and the point put forward by them are two-fold:

                                      (i) the petitioner/ family was never a
                          landless person and the land was settled by way of
                          suppression of fact;
                                      (ii) the steps have already been taken by
                          the respondents for cancellation of the jamabandi
                          created in favour of the petitioner/ family by way of
                          letter no. 1337 dated 09.12.2025 issued by the Circle
                          Officer, Fatehpur, Gaya to the Additional Collector,
                          Gaya (Annexure- P/24 to the I.A. 02 of 2026). This
                          has    resulted     into    the   filing   of   Jamabandi
                          Cancellation Case No. 405/ 2025-26.
                      12. Having heard the parties, this Court is of the opinion

          that when the State respondents have come to a conclusion that a

          jamabandi is continuing in favour of the petitioner, whether it has

          to continue or needs to be canceled, the matter has now gone to the

          Court of learned Additional Collector, Gayaji. Till a decision
           Patna High Court CWJC No.19248 of 2025(5) dt.21-04-2026
                                                      5/5




                     comes after hearing the parties including the petitioner/State

                     respondent, the Circle Officer, Fatehpur, Gaya, erred in issuing No

                     Objection Certificate to the District Co-operative Officer, Gayaji.

                                 13. In that background, allowing the petitioner/State

                     respondent to fight out the battle before the learned Additional

                     Collector, Gayaji, it is observed that till a decision comes in the

                     Jamabandi Cancellation Case No. 405 of 2025-26, the letter no.

                     744 dated 01.07.2025 issued by the Circle Officer, Fatehpur, Gaya

                     to the District Cooperative Officer, Gaya shall remain in abeyance.

                                 14. The writ petitioner is disposed of with aforesaid

                     observation.

                                 15. Pending I.A.(s), if any, also stands disposed of.



                                                   (Rajiv Roy, J)
Vijay Singh/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.