Patna High Court
Gen X Infra Homes Private LimitedversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- ANIL KUMAR SINHA
Holding
The settlement agreement being voluntary and bona‑fide, the writ petition is disposed and the arrest warrant is quashed.
Summary
Gen X Infra Homes Pvt Ltd filed a writ petition challenging an arrest warrant issued by the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) of Bihar. Both the petitioner and Respondent No. 4 (Krishna Singh) jointly submitted that they had reached an amicable settlement on 10 January 2026, documented in a compromise agreement, wherein the respondent confirmed receipt of vacant possession of the flats and parking area. The court examined the voluntary and bona‑fide nature of the settlement and found no coercion or fraud. Consequently, the court quashed the arrest warrant and disposed of the writ petition in accordance with the settlement terms. The matter was thus concluded without further adjudication on the merits of the original dispute.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition can be dismissed on the basis of a settlement agreement between the parties
- Whether the arrest warrant issued by the RERA Authority remains valid after the parties have settled the dispute
Legislation cited
Subjects
- settlement agreement
- compromise
- writ petition
- arrest warrant
- RERA
- civil procedure
- possession
- quash
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19285 of 2025
======================================================
Gen X Infra Homes Private Limited CIN No U70100DL2010PTC204878, a
company incorporated under the provisions of Indian Companies Act, 1956,
having its registered address at C/o I.S.Nayar, B-72, F/F New Govindpura,
New Delhi-110051 and branch office at 4th floor, 402, GenX Icon Road,
Mangalam Colony, Kaliket Nagar, Danapur, Patna-801503, through its
Director, Anupam Kumar, aged about 47 years, Gender-Male, s/o Shri
Akhileshwar Singh, r/o Flat No 603, Ganga 3, Jalalpur City, Danapur, Patna
801503.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Urban Development and
Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department,
Government of Bihar, Old Secretariat, Patna.
3. The Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Bihar, Patna, through its Registrar,
6th Floor, Bihar State Building Construction Corporation Campus, Hospital
Road, Shastri Nagar, Patna - 800023, Bihar.s
4. Krishna Singh, S/o Late Cheta Singh, resident of Rajvanshi Nagar, 36,
Hanuman Nagar, Behind SBI, Punaichak, P.S.- Shastrinagar, District- Patna
800023.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Nikhil Kumar Agrawal, Adv.
: Ms. Aditi Hansaria, Adv.
: Mr. Vivek Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Standing Counsel (12)
: Mr. Kamlesh Kishore, Ac to Sc12
For the Respondent
No. 4 : Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Adv.
: Ms. Priyanka Kumari, Adv.
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER
6 31-01-2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner as well as
respondent no. 4 jointly submit that the parties have arrived at
an amicable settlement through a compromise/settlement
agreement dated 10.01.2026. The compromise/settlement
agreement has been filed at Annexure P/27 by way of second
supplementary affidavit. As per the terms of the
Patna High Court CWJC No.19285 of 2025(6) dt.31-01-2026
2/2
compromise/settlement agreement, all pending disputes, issues
and claims between the parties have been settled on the terms
mentioned in the agreement. The parties have submitted that
compromise agreement has been executed voluntarily by both
the parties and is a bona fide agreement between them without
any coercion, pressure, fraud or undue influence.
2. Respondent No. 4 has confirmed having received
vacant and peaceful possession of the flats and parking area
mentioned in Schedule 1 of the agreement.
3. Considering the submissions made by the parties,
the present writ application is disposed in terms of the
compromise/settlement agreement arrived at between the
petitioner and Respondent No. 4. The warrant of arrest issued by
RERA Authority, annexed at Annexure P/21 and P/22 are hereby
quashed.
4. With the aforesaid observation, the present writ
application is disposed.
(Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
HarshPandey/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.