Patna High Court
Arbind Kumar Singh @ Arbind KumarversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for default and non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioner, Arbind Kumar Singh, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and its officials. The petition was listed for hearing on 2 December 2024 and again on 7 January 2026, but the petitioner failed to appear on either occasion. The learned counsel for the respondents was present, and the court, exercising its discretion, granted a final opportunity to the petitioner to be heard. Despite this indulgence, the petitioner again did not appear before the court on 7 January 2026. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition on the grounds of default and non‑prosecution, ordering its dismissal without further consideration of the merits.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition can be dismissed for default due to the petitioner's failure to appear for hearing
Subjects
- default
- non‑prosecution
- civil writ jurisdiction
- procedural default
- patna high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19506 of 2013
======================================================
Arbind Kumar Singh @ Arbind Kumar Son Of Sri Jai Ram Singh Resident Of
Village- Fulari, P.S.- Sandesh, District- Bhojpur
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar and Ors
2. The Collector, Bhojpur At Ara
3. The Joint Secretary, Revenue And Land Reforms Deptt., Govt. Of Bihar,
Patna
4. The Anchal Adhikari, Barahara, Bhojpur, Ara
5. The Additional Collector, Bhojpur, Ara
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Rajendra Kr. Jha
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
ORAL ORDER
5 07-01-2026 1. This Court has passed an oral order on
06.01.2026, which reads as follows:-
No representation for the
petitioner on 02.12.2024 as well as
today. However, the Learned counsel
for the respondents is present. As a
last indulgence, list on 07.01.2026.
2. In spite of the said order, there is no
representation for the petitioner. Therefore, the
Writ petition is dismissed for default and for non-
prosecution.
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
amitkr/-
U
Checking your session…