Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

M/S Tariyani Engicon Private LimitedversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court held that the petition requires the respondents to consider the debarment and pass a reasoned order after hearing, and therefore did not quash the debarment.

Summary

The petitioner, Tariyani Engicon Private Limited, challenged a letter dated 25 July 2025 that debarred it from participating in any future tenders issued by the Public Health Engineering Department, Bihar. It sought a writ of certiorari to quash the debarment and a writ of mandamus to compel the department to allow it to continue work under agreement SBD‑06 of 2024‑25 and to participate in open tenders. The petitioner submitted representations and a recommendation from the Executive Engineer to lift the debarment, which was pending before the Superintending Engineer. After hearing counsel, the Court directed the respondents to consider the matter, grant a hearing to all stakeholders, and issue a reasoned order within two weeks. Consequently, the writ application was disposed of without granting the reliefs sought.

Issues considered

  • Whether the debarment letter dated 25 July 2025 can be quashed by a writ of certiorari.
  • Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to compel the Public Health Engineering Department to allow the petitioner to continue work under agreement SBD‑06 and to participate in future tenders.
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to an opportunity of hearing before any further debarment or restriction.

Subjects

  • debarment
  • public procurement
  • writ of certiorari
  • mandamus
  • tender participation
  • administrative law
  • public health engineering

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19888 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 M/S Tariyani Engicon Private Limited having its registered office at Vill-
                 Rasulpur, Sayadpur Bazar, Panchayat-Bhikhanpura, Block-Musahri, District-
                 Muzaffarpur, Bihar (CIN U45309B2021PTC052107), through its Director
                 Ravindra Kumar Singh, Male, aged about 46 years, S/o Harendra Kishore
                 Singh, Resident of Village-Paharpur, P.O. Jahangirpur, P.S.-Shyampur
                 Bhathan, District-Sheohar.

                                                                                ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                         Versus

           1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Public Health
                 Engineering Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Principal Secretary, Public Health Engineering Department, Govt. of
                 Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The Engineer in Chief- Cum- Special Secretary, Public Health Engineering
                 Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           4.    The Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering Department, Govt. of Bihar,
                 Patna.
           5.    The Zonal Chief Engineer, Public Health Engineering Zone, Muzaffarpur.
           6.    The Superintending          Engineer,    Public   Health   Engineering    Circle,
                 Muzaffarpur.
           7.    The Executive Engineer, Public Health Division, Sitamarhi.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :        Mr.Siyaram Pandey, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Dewesh Kumar Pandey, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s    :        Mr. G.P.-5
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH)

2   29-01-2026                    Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                 2. The following reliefs have been sought in the

                   present writ application:

                                    “I. Writ of Certiorari for quashing/setting aside the
                                    letter no.65 dated-25.07.2025 as contained in memo
Patna High Court CWJC No.19888 of 2025(2) dt.29-01-2026
                                            2/3




                           no.2029 dated-25.07.2025 issued by the office of the
                           Executive Engineer, Public Health Division, Sitamarhi
                           by which the petitioner is debarred to participate in any
                           next/further respondents, offered tender by the
                           respondents.
                           II. And/or be pleased to issue of a writ in the nature of
                           writ of mandamus or an appropriate writ/writs,
                           order/orders or direction/directions commanding the
                           respondents to allow the petitioners to continue their
                           work allotted in an agreement no. SBD-06 of 2024-25
                           and to take part in any open tender without any
                           hindrance,
                           III. And/or be pleased to pass such other order/orders
                           which may be deemed fit and proper in the facts and
                           circumstances of the case.”


                      3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner had filed representations, as contained in Annexure-

          P/5 series, for redressal of his grievances. It is further submitted

          that the Executive Engineer, Public Health Division, Sitamarhi

          (Respondent No. 7) has recommended to the Superintending

          Engineer, Public Health Engineering Circle, Muzaffarpur

          (Respondent No. 6), vide Annexure-P/4, for lifting the

          debarment of the petitioner. The said recommendation is

          pending consideration before Respondent No. 6.

                      4.     Considering          Annexure-P/4,     the     concerned

          respondents are directed to consider the matter and pass a

          reasoned and speaking order, in accordance with law after

          granting an opportunity of hearing to all the stakeholders,

          preferably within a period of two weeks from the date of
          Patna High Court CWJC No.19888 of 2025(2) dt.29-01-2026
                                                     3/3




                    receipt/production of a copy of this order.

                                5. With the aforesaid observation and direction,

                    the present writ application stands disposed of.

                                6. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand

                    disposed of.



                                                (Sudhir Singh, J)


                                                (Ritesh Kumar, J)
Sujit/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.