Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Intejar Ahmad,versusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The final notice is not per se invalid; the petitioner must appeal to the Collector, and the court stays execution pending that appeal.

Summary

The petitioner, claiming ownership of land settled in his father's favour by a 1964 jamabandi, challenged a final notice dated 01‑12‑2025 issued by the Circle Officer under the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act that declared him an encroacher and ordered vacating the land. He argued that the land is private (rayati) and that he was denied a hearing, violating natural justice. The State contended that the final notice is appealable under Section 11 of the Act and that the petitioner must seek relief from the Collector. The Court held that the statutory remedy of appeal to the Collector remains available and directed that the petitioner may file such an appeal, with a stay on any removal action pending the Collector's decision. Consequently, the writ application was disposed, granting a stay and liberty to appeal, but not quashing the final notice.

Issues considered

  • Whether the final notice under Section 6(2) of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act can be quashed on the ground of lack of hearing and violation of natural justice.
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to a stay of execution of the notice pending appeal.
  • Whether the petitioner must avail the statutory remedy of appeal to the Collector under Section 11 of the Act.

Subjects

  • encroachment
  • public land
  • rayati land
  • jamabandi
  • natural justice
  • stay of execution
  • appeal
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • land dispute

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20293 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Intejar Ahmad, Son of Late Abdul Haque, Resident of Village-
                 Mohammadpur, P.O. Barashankar, P.S. Patahi, District- East Champaran,
                 Bihar-845457.

                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s

                                                    Versus

           1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Revenue and Land
                 Reforms Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The District Magistrate, East Champaran, Bihar.
           3.    The Sub Divisional Officer, Sub Division- Pakaridayal, P.S. Patahi, District-
                 East Champaran, Bihar.
           4.    The Circle Officer, Patahi, East Champaran, Bihar.

                                                                           ... ... Respondent/s

                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Vikas Ratan Bharti, Advocate
                                               Mr. Zaki Haider, Advocate
                                               Mr. Deepak Kumar, Advocate
                                               Mr. Kumar Abhishek, Advocate
                 For the State          :      Ms. Anuradha Singh, SC-21
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   19-01-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the parties concerned.

                                 2. The petitioner has filed the present writ application

                   for quashing the final notice dated 01.12.2025 issued by the

                   Circle Officer, Patahi, East Champaran, in Encroachment Case

                   No. 02/2021-22 directing the petitioner to remove encroachment

                   from the public land situated in village Barashankar, Thana No.

                   171, P.S-Patahi, District, East Champaran, having Khata No.

                   460, Plot No. 2894, 2813, 2893, and 2893, with areas of 7.7
Patna High Court CWJC No.20293 of 2025(3) dt.19-01-2026
                                           2/4




          decimal, 0.8 decimal, and 7.3 decimal, respectively.

                      3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          petitioner, along with his family members, is the owner of the

          land in question, which was settled by the original landlord,

          namely, late Abdul Haque, in favour of the father of the

          petitioner. The jamabandi of the land was created in the year

          1964 in the name of petitioner’s father, having jamabandi no.

          1245, the rent receipt is being paid since 1964-65. A notice

          under Section 3 of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act was

          issued on 07.04.2025 in Encroachment Case No. 02/2021-22,

          and in response thereto, the petitioner submitted his reply dated

          25.04.2025, taking the stand that the land in question is not the

          public land and is a rayati land for which jamabandi was created

          in favour of the petitioner’s father long back in 1964. Suddenly,

          the petitioner was served with the impugned final notice under

          Section 6(2) dated 01.12.2025, by which the petitioner has been

          declared an encroacher and has been directed to vacate the land

          in question.

                      4. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits

          that the residential house of the petitioner is situated on the

          subject land in which he is residing along with his family

          members. Before issuance of the impugned final notice, no
Patna High Court CWJC No.20293 of 2025(3) dt.19-01-2026
                                           3/4




          opportunity was ever given to the petitioner to appear and place

          his case before the Circle Officer, and the final order has been

          passed behind the back of the petitioner in violation of the

          principle of natural justice. Even a copy of the final order has

          not been made available to the petitioner by the concerned

          respondent.

                      5. Learned counsel for the State submits that final

          notice is appealable before the Collector under Section 11 of the

          Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act; the petitioner can avail

          the remedy of appeal before the Collector.

                      6. Considering the submissions made by the parties

          and the fact that final notice under Section 6(2) has been served

          upon the petitioner, the present writ application is disposed with

          liberty to the petitioner to challenge the final order and/or final

          notice dated 01.12.2025 before the Collector of East

          Champaran, Motihari, and if such an appeal is filed by the

          petitioner, the District Collector shall call for the record of

          Encroachment Case No. 02/2021-22 and shall pass a

          reasoned/speaking order after giving a personal hearing to the

          petitioner within a reasonable time frame.

                      7. It is made clear that till the appeal is disposed by

          the District Collector, East Champaran, Motihari, the operation
           Patna High Court CWJC No.20293 of 2025(3) dt.19-01-2026
                                                      4/4




                     of the impugned notice dated 02/2021-22 at Annexure 5 shall

                     remain stayed, and the petitioner shall not be removed from the

                     land in question.

                                 8. Accordingly, with the aforesaid direction, the

                     present application stands disposed of.



                                             (Anil Kumar Sinha, J)
Siwani/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.