Patna High Court
Shyam Deo Sah @ Shaymdev SahversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
Holding
The writ petition is not maintainable as the petitioner must pursue the alternative remedy provided under the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016.
Summary
Shyam Deo Sah, holder of a Public Distribution System (PDS) license No. 17/2016, challenged the cancellation of his license by a memo dated 18‑01‑2019 through a writ petition seeking certiorari and mandamus. The respondents argued that the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 provides a specific appeal, revision and representation mechanism, which the petitioner had not used. The petitioner claimed the limitation period for filing a representation had lapsed and sought condonation under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The Court observed that an alternative statutory remedy exists and therefore the writ petition is not maintainable. It directed the petitioner to file a representation within one month, with the authority to condone the delay and decide the matter within three months. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of.
Issues considered
- Whether the High Court can entertain the writ petition when the petitioner has an alternative remedy under the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016.
- Whether the limitation period for filing a representation can be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 — s. 32(iii), 32(v), 32(vi)
- Limitation Act — s. 5
Subjects
- Public Distribution System
- License cancellation
- Writ of certiorari
- Mandamus
- Alternative remedy
- Limitation
- Representation
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20337 of 2019
======================================================
Shyam Deo Sah @ Shaymdev Sah S/o Late Vansi Sah Resident of Village-
Bara Takia, Khodaibagh, P.s.- Khaira, District- Saran
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. The Divisional Commissioner Saran at Chapra
3. The District Magistrate Saran at Chapra
4. The Sub-Divisional Officer (Supply Division) Chapra Sadar, Saran at
Chapra
5. The Block Supply Officer Nagra, Saran at Chapra
6. The Block Supply Officer Baniyapur, Saran at Chapra
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Advocate
For the Respondents : Mr. S. Raza Ahmad, AAG5
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 22-06-2026
1. The Writ petition is filed for the
following reliefs:
“(I). For issuance of an appropriate Writ in
the nature of certiorari for quashing the
memo no. 403 dated 18.01.2019 issued
under the signature of the Sub Divisional
Officer (Supply Branch), Chapra Sadar, by
which, the license of the petitioner under
Public Distribution System bearing license
No. 17/2016 has been cancelled, without
appreciating the facts and circumstances.
Patna High Court CWJC No.20337 of 2019 dt.22-06-2026
2/5
(II). For issuance of an appropriate Writ in
the nature of mandamus for commanding
and directing the respondent authorities
concerned to restore the license of the
petitioner bearing license no. 17/2016
granted to him for distribution of
foodgrains under Public Distribution
System, so that the petitioner might be
able to distribute the essential
commodities to the ration card holders,
without any further delay.
(III). For issuance of any other Writ/Writs,
order/orders, direction/directions for which
the petitioner would be entitled in the
facts and circumstances of the present
case.”
2. At this juncture, the Learned counsel for
the respondents contended that Section 32(iii) of the
Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control)
Order, 2016 provides for the provision of appeal and
Section 32(vi) of the Bihar Targeted Public
Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 provides
Patna High Court CWJC No.20337 of 2019 dt.22-06-2026
3/5
for the provision of revision. Section 32(iii) 32(v) and
32(vi) read as follows:
“32 (iii). Any person aggrieved by
an order of the licensing authority denying
the issue or renewal of the license to the
fair price shop owner or cancellation of the
license may appeal to the District Officer
within thirty days of the date of receipt of
the order and the District Magistrate shall,
as far as practicable, dispose the appeal
within a period of sixty days.”
32. (v) Till the disposal of appeal
pending, the Appellate Authority may
direct that the order under appeal shall
not take effect for such period as the
authority may consider necessary for
giving a reasonable opportunity to the
other party under sub-clause (4) or until
the appeal is disposed of, whichever is
earlier.
(vi) Due to non disposal of the
appeal within sixty days by the District
Patna High Court CWJC No.20337 of 2019 dt.22-06-2026
4/5
Officer or against the order passed in the
appeal, a revision may be filed before the
Divisional Commissioner. The revision
shall be disposed of within two months.”
3. Admittedly, from the reliefs prayed for in
the Writ petition, it is evident that the petitioner has
an alternative remedy under the provisions of bihar
targeted public distribution system (control) order,
2016.
4. The Learned counsel for the petitioner
contended that he intends to file a representation
before the concerned authority, but the limitation
period for filing the same has lapsed. He prayed for a
direction to the concerned authority to entertain the
same in accordance with Section 5 of the Limitation
Act.
5. Taking into consideration that the
petitioner has an alternative remedy for filing
representation, the Writ petition is disposed of with a
direction to the petitioner to file representation
within one month from the date of receipt of this
order before the concerned authority. The delay in
Patna High Court CWJC No.20337 of 2019 dt.22-06-2026
5/5
filing the representation shall be condoned by the
authority concerned, and the authority shall dispose
of the same within three months from the date of
filing of the same.
6. With the above said observation, the Writ
petition is disposed of.
7. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall
stand disposed of
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
Shanu/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR
CAV DATE N/A
Uploading Date
Transmission Date
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.