Patna High Court
Binod KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed and the petitioner is directed to file a revision before the Divisional Commissioner, with the delay condoned.
Summary
Petitioner Binod Kumar challenged the suspension of his PDS licence (No. 87/08) by the Sub‑Divisional Officer, which was affirmed by the District Collector in an appeal. He filed a writ petition seeking quash of the suspension order and direction to allocate his licence to a Fair Price Shop. Respondents relied on Section 32(v) and 32(vi) of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016, which provide for a revision before the Divisional Commissioner if an appeal is not disposed within sixty days. The petitioner argued that the limitation period for filing such a revision had expired and sought a court direction to allow the revision under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The High Court held that the petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy of filing a revision, directed him to file the revision within four weeks, and ordered the Divisional Commissioner to condone the delay and dispose of the revision within two months, thereby disposing of the writ petition.
Issues considered
- Whether the writ petition is maintainable when a statutory revision remedy exists under the Bihar PDS Order.
- Whether the court can condone the lapse of the limitation period for filing the revision petition.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 — s. 32(v), 32(vi)
- Limitation Act, 1963 — s. 5
Subjects
- Public Distribution System
- License suspension
- Revision
- Limitation Act
- Writ petition
- Administrative law
- Bihar
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20453 of 2019
======================================================
Binod Kumar son of Late Ramchandra Prasad, Resident of Danapur Nriyal
Ghat Ward No.- 28, H.No. 55, Police Station- Danapur, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Department of Food and
Consumers Protection, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The District Magistrate, Patna.
3. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Danapur, District- Patna.
4. The Block Supply Officer, Danapur, District- Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Binay Kumar, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Arvind Ujjwal (SC4)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 22-06-2026
1. The Writ petition is filed for the
following reliefs:
That this is an application for
issuance of appropriate writ/writs,
order/orders and direction/directions
to quash the order dated 04.02.2019
passed in E.W. Appeal Case No.
28/2018-19 whereby the Ld District
Collector, Patna has affirmed the
suspension order dated 23.08.2011
contained in Memo No. 813 of the
sub-Divisional Officer cum licensing
Authority, Danapur by which the PDS
license No. 87/08 of the petitioner
had been suspended without his
jurisdiction and for direction to start
the allocation to the Fair Price Shop
of the petitioner after declaring the
suspension order null and void
Patna High Court CWJC No.20453 of 2019 dt.22-06-2026
2/3
and/or pass such other order or
orders as your Lordships may deem
fit and proper.
2. At this juncture, the Learned counsel for
the respondents contended that Section 32(vi) of
the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System
(Control) Order, 2016 provides for the provision of
revision. Section 32(v) and (vi) read as follows:
“32. (v) Till the disposal of
appeal pending, the Appellate
Authority may direct that the order
under appeal shall not take effect for
such period as the authority may
consider necessary for giving a
reasonable opportunity to the other
party under sub-clause (4) or until
the appeal is disposed of, whichever
is earlier.
(vi) Due to non disposal of
the appeal within sixty days by the
District Officer or against the order
passed in the appeal, a revision may
be filed before the Divisional
Commissioner. The revision shall be
disposed of within two months.
3. Admittedly, the present case is filed
against the order of District Magistrate in E.C.
Appeal Case No. 28/2018-19 dated 19.09.2018.
4. The Learned counsel for the petitioner
contended that he intends to file a revision before
the Divisional Commissioner, but the limitation
Patna High Court CWJC No.20453 of 2019 dt.22-06-2026
3/3
period for filing the revision has lapsed. He prayed
for a direction to the concerned Divisional
Commissioner to entertain the revision petition in
accordance with Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
5. Taking into consideration that the
petitioner has an alternative remedy for filing a
revision, the Writ petition is disposed of with a
direction to the petitioner to file the revision
petition within four weeks from the date of receipt
of this order before the Divisional Commissioner.
The delay in filing the revision shall be condoned
by the Divisional Commissioner, and the authority
shall dispose of the revision within two months
from the date of filing of the revision petition.
6. With the above said observation, the
Writ petition is disposed of.
7. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall
stand disposed of.
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
Shanu/-
AFR/NAFR
CAV DATE
Uploading Date
Transmission Date
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.