Patna High Court
Sudarshan PaswanversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISSED
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.
Summary
The petitioner, Sudarshan Paswan, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and its transport and finance departments. During the proceedings, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the matter had become infructuous. Consequently, the court held that there was no longer any live dispute to adjudicate. The writ petition was therefore dismissed as infructuous. No substantive merits of the original claim were examined.
Issues considered
- The petition should be dismissed on the ground that the cause of action has become infructuous.
Subjects
- writ petition
- infructuous
- dismissal
- civil writ jurisdiction
- Patna High Court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20730 of 2013
======================================================
Sudarshan Paswan S/O Late Chandradeep Paswan Resident Of Village- Neora Ganj,
Post Office- Neora, Police Station- Bihta, District- Patna.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar through the Principal Secretary-cum-Commissioner,
Department of Transport, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary- Cum- Commissioner, Department Of Transport,
Government Of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Additional Transport Commissioner, Department Of Transport, Government Of
Bihar, Patna.
4. Sri Prakash Swaroop S/O Section Officer, Department Of Transport, Government
Of Bihar, Patna
5. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Finance Government Of Bihar, Patna.
6. The Accountant General Ag, Bihar, Patna.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Anand Kumar Ojha, Sr. Advocate
: Mr. Shankar Kumar, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Shail Kumari
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
ORAL ORDER
4 08-01-2026 1. The Learned counsel, Mr. Shankar
Kumar, representing the Learned Senior counsel
Mr. Anand Kumar Ojha reported to the Court that
the matter has become infructuous.
2. Therefore, the Writ petition stands
dismissed as infructuous.
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
amitkr/-
U
Checking your session…