Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dauli KumariversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The writ application is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

Dauli Kumari filed a writ application seeking a mandamus directing the State authorities to appoint an Anganwadi sevika as per a district magistrate's memo dated 07/13, which had been pending for a long time. She later claimed the matter had become infructuous due to the passage of time and requested to withdraw the application. The court, without examining the merits, accepted the withdrawal request. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of as withdrawn. No substantive order on the appointment was made.

Issues considered

  • What procedural steps are required when a petitioner seeks to withdraw a pending writ application?

Subjects

  • writ jurisdiction
  • mandamus
  • Anganwadi
  • withdrawal of petition
  • public welfare

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2075 of 2017
                 ======================================================
                 Dauli Kumari Wife of Sanjiv Kumar, resident of Village- Adauri, P.S.
                 Purnahiya, District- Sheohar.
                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
           1.     The State Of Bihar through the Secretary Social Welfare Department, Bihar,
                  Patna.
           2.    The Director Integrated Child Development Scheme, Old Secretariat, Patna.
           3.    The District Magistrate, Sheohar.
           4.    The Child Development Project Officer, Purnahiya, District- Sheohar.
           5.    The District Programme Officer, Sheohar.
           6.    Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj Adauri, District- Sheohar.
           7.    The District Programme Officer, Sheohar.
                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s    :      Mr. Devendra Kumar, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s    :      Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA-7
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   19-01-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   counsel for the respondents.

                               2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for

                   the following relief(s) :-

                                   “1. That by this writ application the petitioner
                                   seeks indulgence of this Hon'ble Court inter-alia,
                                   to issuence of writ in nature of mandamous or any
                                   other     appropriate    writ/writs,    order/orders,
                                   direction/directions     and     commanding        the
                                   respondent authorities to make a direction for the
                                   processes of an appointment of Anganwari sevika
                                   within stipulated period with regard to the Memo
                                   No.       dated     /07/13. issued by the District
                                   Magistrate, Sheohar which was pending since
         Patna High Court CWJC No.2075 of 2017(4) dt.19-01-2026
                                                     2/2




                                    long time and any other/others relief/reliefs as
                                    your Lordships may deem fit and proper.”


                               3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

                   matter raised in the instant application having become

                   infructuous with the passage of time, the petitioner does not

                   press the instant case and seeks permission to withdraw the

                   application.

                               4. In view of the above, without entering into the

                   merits of the case of the petitioner, the writ application stands

                   disposed of as withdrawn.



                                              (Partha Sarthy, J)
Shiv/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.