Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Md. Hasim Haidar @ Md. Hasim Haider Ansari,versusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed because the petitioner (or his heirs) must avail the alternative statutory appeal provided under the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016.

Summary

The petitioner, Md. Hasim Haidar, filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of his PDS license issued by the Sub‑divisional Officer on 06‑09‑2019. While the petition was pending, the petitioner died and sought to file a substitution petition on behalf of his legal heirs. The respondents contended that the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 provides a specific appeal and revision mechanism under Section 32(iii), (v) and (vi) for aggrieved licensees. The Court observed that an alternative statutory remedy exists and that the petitioner’s death does not create a fresh right to approach the High Court. Consequently, the Court directed the legal heirs to prefer an appeal under the statutory provision within one month and directed the concerned authority to dispose of the appeal within three months. The writ petition was therefore disposed without any further order.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a PDS license is maintainable when a specific statutory appeal under the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 is available.
  • Whether the death of the petitioner necessitates a substitution petition or can be dealt with by directing the legal heirs to pursue the statutory appeal.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • PDS license cancellation
  • alternative statutory remedy
  • appeal under Section 32
  • revision
  • substitution petition
  • death of petitioner
  • administrative law

Judgment

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                    Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20794 of 2019
     ======================================================
     Md. Hasim Haidar @ Md. Hasim Haider Ansari, son of Late Md. Mukim
     Unis, resident of ward No. 6, Gogri, P.S.- Gogri, District- Khagaria.

                                                                  ... ... Petitioner
                                       Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.   The Principal Secretary, Deptt. of Food and Consumer Protection, Govt. of
     Bihar, Patna.
3.   The District Magistrate, Khagaria, Distt- Khagaria.
4.   The Sub-divisional Officer-cum- Licensing Officer, Gogri, District-
     Khagaria.
5.   The District Supply Officer, Gogri, Distt- Khagaria.
6.   The Block Supply Officer, Gogri, Distt- Khagaria.

                                               ... ... Respondents
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Amrendra Kumar
     For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. S.Raza Ahmad (Aag5)
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA
     CHAKRAVARTHY
                     ORAL JUDGMENT
      Date : 22-06-2026


                   1. Heard the Learned counsel for the

     petitioner as well as Learned counsel for the

     respondents.

                 2. It is submitted by the Learned counsel for

     the petitioner that the petitioner has filed the Writ

     petition challenging the cancellation order of PDS,

     passed by the Sub-divisional Officer, Gogri dated

     06.09.2019. It is further submitted that the the

     petitioner died during the pendency of the Writ
Patna High Court CWJC No.20794 of 2019 dt.22-06-2026
                                           2/4




       petition and he intends to file a substitution petition

       to bring the legal heirs on record.

                    2. On the other hand, the Learned counsel

       for the respondents contended that Section 32(iii) of

       the      Bihar       Targeted         Public    Distribution   System

       (Control) Order, 2016 provides for the provision of

       appeal and             Section 32(vi) of the Bihar Targeted

       Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016

       provides for the provision of revision. Section 32(iii)

       32(v) and 32(vi) read as follows:

                                     “32     (iii).  Any     person
                            aggrieved by an order of the licensing
                            authority denying the issue or
                            renewal of the license to the fair price
                            shop owner or cancellation of the
                            license may appeal to the District
                            Officer within thirty days of the date
                            of receipt of the order and the District
                            Magistrate shall, as far as practicable,
                            dispose the appeal within a period of
                            sixty days.”
                                     32. (v) Till the disposal of
                            appeal     pending,     the   Appellate
                            Authority may direct that the order
                            under appeal shall not take effect for
                            such period as the authority may
                            consider necessary for giving a
                            reasonable opportunity to the other
                            party under sub-clause (4) or until the
                            appeal is disposed of, whichever is
                            earlier.
Patna High Court CWJC No.20794 of 2019 dt.22-06-2026
                                           3/4




                                     (vi) Due to non disposal of
                            the appeal within sixty days by the
                            District Officer or against the order
                            passed in the appeal, a revision may
                            be filed before the Divisional
                            Commissioner. The revision shall be
                            disposed of within two months.


                    3. Admittedly, from the reliefs prayed for in

        the Writ petition, it is evident that the petitioner has

        an alternative remedy to prefer an appeal against

        cancellation orders of the PDS license under the

        provisions of             Bihar Targeted Public Distribution

        System (Control) Order, 2016, and without availing

        the      alternative           remedy,         the   petitioner   has

        approached this Court.

                    5.     Taking       into      consideration    that   the

       petitioner is no more and alternative remedy is also

       available, the Writ petition is disposed of with a

       direction that, instead of filing a substitution petition

       in the Writ petition, if the legal heirs of the petitioner

       intend to prefer an appeal, they shall approach the

       concerned authority within one month from the date

       of receipt of this order. In turn, the concerned

       authority shall dispose of the appeal within three
             Patna High Court CWJC No.20794 of 2019 dt.22-06-2026
                                                        4/4




                    months from the date of filing of the appeal,

                    considering the materials available on record.

                                 7. With the above said observation, the Writ

                    petition is disposed of.

                                 8. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall

                    stand disposed of.



                                                   (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
Shanu/-
AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                N/A
Uploading Date
Transmission Date


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.