Patna High Court
Md. Hasim Haidar @ Md. Hasim Haider Ansari,versusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed because the petitioner (or his heirs) must avail the alternative statutory appeal provided under the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016.
Summary
The petitioner, Md. Hasim Haidar, filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of his PDS license issued by the Sub‑divisional Officer on 06‑09‑2019. While the petition was pending, the petitioner died and sought to file a substitution petition on behalf of his legal heirs. The respondents contended that the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 provides a specific appeal and revision mechanism under Section 32(iii), (v) and (vi) for aggrieved licensees. The Court observed that an alternative statutory remedy exists and that the petitioner’s death does not create a fresh right to approach the High Court. Consequently, the Court directed the legal heirs to prefer an appeal under the statutory provision within one month and directed the concerned authority to dispose of the appeal within three months. The writ petition was therefore disposed without any further order.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition challenging the cancellation of a PDS license is maintainable when a specific statutory appeal under the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 is available.
- Whether the death of the petitioner necessitates a substitution petition or can be dealt with by directing the legal heirs to pursue the statutory appeal.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 — s. 32(iii), 32(v), 32(vi)
Subjects
- writ petition
- PDS license cancellation
- alternative statutory remedy
- appeal under Section 32
- revision
- substitution petition
- death of petitioner
- administrative law
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20794 of 2019
======================================================
Md. Hasim Haidar @ Md. Hasim Haider Ansari, son of Late Md. Mukim
Unis, resident of ward No. 6, Gogri, P.S.- Gogri, District- Khagaria.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Deptt. of Food and Consumer Protection, Govt. of
Bihar, Patna.
3. The District Magistrate, Khagaria, Distt- Khagaria.
4. The Sub-divisional Officer-cum- Licensing Officer, Gogri, District-
Khagaria.
5. The District Supply Officer, Gogri, Distt- Khagaria.
6. The Block Supply Officer, Gogri, Distt- Khagaria.
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amrendra Kumar
For the Respondent/s : Mr. S.Raza Ahmad (Aag5)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA
CHAKRAVARTHY
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 22-06-2026
1. Heard the Learned counsel for the
petitioner as well as Learned counsel for the
respondents.
2. It is submitted by the Learned counsel for
the petitioner that the petitioner has filed the Writ
petition challenging the cancellation order of PDS,
passed by the Sub-divisional Officer, Gogri dated
06.09.2019. It is further submitted that the the
petitioner died during the pendency of the Writ
Patna High Court CWJC No.20794 of 2019 dt.22-06-2026
2/4
petition and he intends to file a substitution petition
to bring the legal heirs on record.
2. On the other hand, the Learned counsel
for the respondents contended that Section 32(iii) of
the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System
(Control) Order, 2016 provides for the provision of
appeal and Section 32(vi) of the Bihar Targeted
Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016
provides for the provision of revision. Section 32(iii)
32(v) and 32(vi) read as follows:
“32 (iii). Any person
aggrieved by an order of the licensing
authority denying the issue or
renewal of the license to the fair price
shop owner or cancellation of the
license may appeal to the District
Officer within thirty days of the date
of receipt of the order and the District
Magistrate shall, as far as practicable,
dispose the appeal within a period of
sixty days.”
32. (v) Till the disposal of
appeal pending, the Appellate
Authority may direct that the order
under appeal shall not take effect for
such period as the authority may
consider necessary for giving a
reasonable opportunity to the other
party under sub-clause (4) or until the
appeal is disposed of, whichever is
earlier.
Patna High Court CWJC No.20794 of 2019 dt.22-06-2026
3/4
(vi) Due to non disposal of
the appeal within sixty days by the
District Officer or against the order
passed in the appeal, a revision may
be filed before the Divisional
Commissioner. The revision shall be
disposed of within two months.
3. Admittedly, from the reliefs prayed for in
the Writ petition, it is evident that the petitioner has
an alternative remedy to prefer an appeal against
cancellation orders of the PDS license under the
provisions of Bihar Targeted Public Distribution
System (Control) Order, 2016, and without availing
the alternative remedy, the petitioner has
approached this Court.
5. Taking into consideration that the
petitioner is no more and alternative remedy is also
available, the Writ petition is disposed of with a
direction that, instead of filing a substitution petition
in the Writ petition, if the legal heirs of the petitioner
intend to prefer an appeal, they shall approach the
concerned authority within one month from the date
of receipt of this order. In turn, the concerned
authority shall dispose of the appeal within three
Patna High Court CWJC No.20794 of 2019 dt.22-06-2026
4/4
months from the date of filing of the appeal,
considering the materials available on record.
7. With the above said observation, the Writ
petition is disposed of.
8. Interlocutory Application(s), if any, shall
stand disposed of.
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
Shanu/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR
CAV DATE N/A
Uploading Date
Transmission Date
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.