Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Subhash Kumar MehtaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court declined to issue a mandamus and instead directed the petitioner to approach the District Mining Officer to pay the fine and obtain release of the truck.

Summary

Petitioner Subhash Kumar Mehta filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to release his truck (Reg. No. JH-12K-9048) seized on 02.12.2024 for alleged overloading of stone chips, claiming the seizure was illegal as it was done without notice or a hearing. The petitioner also sought compensation for the alleged illegal confinement of his vehicle. The Mines Department argued that the truck could be released upon payment of the fine, subject to continuation of proceedings. The Court, after hearing both sides, directed the petitioner to approach the District Mining Officer within a week to settle the fine and obtain release of the truck. No compensation was ordered, and the petition was disposed with the direction for administrative resolution.

Issues considered

  • Whether the seizure of the petitioner's truck without notice or hearing violates his legal rights.
  • Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to compel the respondents to release the seized vehicle.
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to compensation for the alleged illegal confinement of his truck.

Subjects

  • vehicle seizure
  • overloading
  • mandamus
  • compensation
  • mining law
  • administrative law
  • district mining officer

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2084 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 Subhash Kumar Mehta Son of Chotelal Mehta, R/o Behradih, Domchanch,
                 District- Koderma (Jharkhand).

                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Secretary, Department of Mines and Geology, Government of Bihar,
                 Patna.
           3.    The District Magistrate, Nawada.
           4.    The Mineral Development Officer, District Mining Office, Nawada.
           5.    The Mining Inspector, District Mining Office, Nawada.
           6.    The Officer-in-Charge, Rajauli Police Station, Nawada.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s      :        Mr. Rajnikant, Advocate
                                           :        Mr. Masoom Raza, Advocate
                 For the State             :        Mr. Government Pleader (04)
                 For the Mines Dept.       :        Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Spl. PP Mines
                                           :        Ms. Shruti Singh, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-04-2026                          Heard Mr. Rajnikant, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner and Ms. Shruti Singh, learned counsel representing

                   the Mines Department beside learned State counsel.

                                 2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   grant of following relief(s):

                                               “(i) for issuance of writ in the nature of

                                         "Mandamus" upon the concerned respondents to

                                         release the seized Truck of the petitioner bearing

                                         Registration No. JH-12K-9048 which has been
Patna High Court CWJC No.2084 of 2026(2) dt.23-04-2026
                                            2/3




                             illegally seized on 02.12.2024 in Rajauli P.S.

                             Case No.562/2024, without any notice or

                             opportunity of hearing.

                                         (ii) for issuance of an appropriate writ

                             or any other order or direction commanding the

                             respondent authorities to release the vehicle

                             (Truck) of the petitioner bearing Registration

                             No.JH-12K-9048.

                                         (iii) for direction to the respondent

                             authorities to pay compensation to the petitioner

                             for illegal confinement of his commercial

                             vehicle.

                                         (iv) for issuance of such other order or

                             direction as the petitioner may be found entitled

                             to in the facts and circumstances of the instant

                             case.”

                      3. The Truck bearing registration no. JH-12K-9048

          was intercepted near Rajauli and found involved in overloading

          stone chips, this led to the F.I.R. vide a Rajauli P.S. Case No.562

          of 2024 and the Truck stands seized.

                      4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he

          shall be fighting the battle out in the Court but the seizure of

          vehicle has put him in economic crisis and even the condition of
            Patna High Court CWJC No.2084 of 2026(2) dt.23-04-2026
                                                        3/3




                      the truck is deteriorating, it being kept in the open sky and he is

                      ready to pay the fine amount under protest. Learned counsel for

                      the petitioner further submits that during the pendency of the

                      proceeding, the truck shall not be alienated and will be produced

                      as and when required by the respondent authorities.

                                  5. Learned counsel representing the Mines Department

                      submits that if the petitioner is ready to pay the fine amount, the

                      truck shall be released subject to the proceeding to be continued.

                                  6. In that background, with the consent of the parties,

                      the writ petition is disposed of allowing the petitioner to approach

                      the District Mining Officer, Nawada in next one week who shall

                      be taking up the matter and after payment of fine amount, shall

                      release the truck.



                                                    (Rajiv Roy, J)
vinayak/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.