Patna High Court
Jitendra Kumar Satyarthi and AnrversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for default and non‑prosecution.
Summary
The petitioners, Jitendra Kumar Satyarthi and another, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and several civil aviation officials. No counsel appeared on behalf of the petitioners on the scheduled dates, including the court's earlier order on 08‑01‑2016 and the hearing on 09‑01‑2026. The court noted the continued absence of representation despite a last‑minute indulgence to list the matter. Consequently, the court dismissed the writ petition on the grounds of default and non‑prosecution. The order was delivered by Justice G. Anupama Chakravarthy.
Issues considered
- What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to appear or prosecute a writ petition?
Subjects
- default judgment
- writ petition
- civil procedure
- non‑prosecution
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20929 of 2013
======================================================
1. Jitendra Kumar Satyarthi and Anr S/O Late Dudheshwar Singh R/O Jagdev
Nagar, P.S.- Rupaspur, Danapur, District- Patna.
2. Ajay Kuamr S/O Sri Suresh Prasad Singh, Ward No. 09 Near State Bank Of
India Birpur, P.S.-Birpur, District-Supaul.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar and Ors
2. Director, Civil Aviation, Patna Airport, Patna 800014.
3. Director, Operations Civil Aviation Directorate, Patna Airport, Patna
800014.
4. Shiva Prakash, Chief Flying Instructor, Patna Airport, Patna-800014.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None.
For the Respondent/s : Smt. Binita Singh, SC -28.
Mr. Ujjwal Bhushan AC to SC 28
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA
CHAKRAVARTHY
ORAL ORDER
5 09-01-2026 1. None has appeared on behalf of the
petitioners.
2. This Court had passed an oral order on
08.01.2016, which reads as follows.
“No representation on behalf of
the petitioner on 15.09.2025 as well as
today i.e. 08.01.2026. As a last
indulgence, list on 09.01.2026..”
3. In spite of that there is no
representation on behalf of the petitioners today.
Patna High Court CWJC No.20929 of 2013(5) dt.09-01-2026
2/2
4. The writ petition, therefore, is
dismissed for default and for non-prosecution
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
sunilkumar/-
U
Checking your session…