Patna High Court
Kusum KumariversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed for default and non‑prosecution.
Summary
Petitioner Kusum Kumari filed a civil writ petition against the State of Bihar and several officials. No counsel appeared for the petitioner on the scheduled hearing dates of 09-12-2024 and 08-01-2026. The respondents' counsel informed the court that the matter had become infructuous, but the court listed the case again to determine if any cause of action remained. Again, no representation was made for the petitioner on 09-01-2026. Consequently, the High Court dismissed the writ petition for default and non‑prosecution.
Issues considered
- Whether any cause of action survived to warrant continuation of the writ petition
- Whether the petition can be dismissed for default due to non‑appearance of counsel
Subjects
- writ petition
- default dismissal
- civil writ jurisdiction
- non‑prosecution
- high court
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20973 of 2013
======================================================
Kusum Kumari D/O Sri Bhagirath Prasad Sigh R/O Mohalla Bhikhana
Pahari, P.S. Pirbahore, District Patna, At Present Posted As Child
Development Project Officer Gai Ghat, P.S. Gai Ghat, District Muzaffarpur,
Bihar.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar and Ors
2. The Principal Secretary To The Government Of Bihar, Old Secretariat, P.S.
Sachibalya, District Patn
3. The Principal Secretary Cum Commissioner, Personal Administrative
Reforms Department Government Of
4. The Principal Secretary Cum Commissioner, Welfare, Government Of Bihar,
Old Secretariat, P.S. Sachi
5. The Special Secretary, Welfare Department, Government Of Bihar, Old
Secretariat, P.S. Sachibalya, D
6. Indu Kumari W/O Nirmal Kumar Former Block Development, Officer Cum
Circle Officer, Gaunaha, West Champaran Presently, Posted As Mid Day
Meal Incharge Madhubani, P.S. Madhubani, District Madhubani, Bihar.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : None.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Manoj Kumar AC to GP-4
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA
CHAKRAVARTHY
ORAL ORDER
5 09-01-2026 1. None has appeared on behalf of the
petitioner.
2. This Court had passed an oral order on
08.01.2016, which reads as follows.
“1. No representation on behalf
of the petitioner on 09.12.2024 as well as
today i.e. 08.01.2026.
2. On the other hand, the
Patna High Court CWJC No.20973 of 2013(5) dt.09-01-2026
2/2
Learned counsel for the respondents
reports to the Court that the matter has
become infructuous.
3. However, for giving a fair
opportunity of hearing to the Learned
counsel for the petitioner whether any
cause of action still survives or not, list on
09.01.2026”
3. In spite of that there is no
representation on behalf of the petitioner today.
4. The writ petition, therefore, is
dismissed for default and for non-prosecution
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
sunilkumar/-
U
Checking your session…