Patna High Court
Vijay Kumar,versusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
Holding
The court held that the writ petition is not maintainable and the petitioner must pursue the statutory revision remedy, with the delay in filing the revision condoned under the Limitation Act.
Summary
Vijay Kumar filed a writ petition challenging the alleged arbitrary and discriminatory selection for allotment of Fair Price Shops (PDS dealership) in Beldaur, Khagaria, seeking quashing of the selection, allotment in his favour and a stay of the process. The respondents, representing the State of Bihar, relied on Section 32(vi) of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016, which provides for a revision before the Divisional Commissioner within sixty days. The petitioner admitted that the limitation period for filing the revision had lapsed and requested the court to direct the Divisional Commissioner to entertain the revision under Section 5 of the Limitation Act. The court held that the petitioner has an alternative statutory remedy of filing a revision and therefore the writ petition is not maintainable. It directed the petitioner to file the revision within four weeks and ordered that the delay be condoned, with the revision to be disposed of within three months. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed of without granting any of the reliefs sought.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition is maintainable when an alternative statutory remedy of revision is available under the Bihar Targeted PDS (Control) Order, 2016.
- Whether the limitation period for filing a revision can be condoned under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
- Whether the court can stay the operation of the selection process pending the filing of a revision.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016 — s. 32(v), 32(vi)
- Limitation Act, 1963 — s. 5
Subjects
- PDS dealership
- fair price shop
- revision
- limitation
- writ petition
- administrative law
- selection process
- quashing order
- stay
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21272 of 2019
======================================================
Vijay Kumar, S/o Ramchandra Prasad, Resident of Village- Ward No. 16,
Beldaur, P.O. and P.S. Beldour, District- Khagaria.
... ... PetitioneR
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer
Protection Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Additional Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Govt.
of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Joint Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Govt. of
Bihar, Patna.
4. The District Collector cum District Magistrate, Khagaria.
5. The District Officer cum Chairman District Selection Committee, Khagaria.
6. The District Supply Officer, Khagaria.
7. The Sub Divisional Officer, Gogri Jamalpur, District- Khagaria.
8. The Block Supply Officer, Beldour, District- Khagaria.
9. The Block Development Officer Beldour Block, District- Khagaria.
10. Priya Bharti, W/o Gulsan Yadav, Resident of Village- Jharebabas, P.S.-
Beldaur, District- Khagaria.
11. Umesh Pandit, S/o Bindeswari Pandit, Resident of Village- Beldour, P.S.,
P.O./Block- Beldour, District- Khagaria.
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Nafisuzzoha, Advocate
For the Respondents : Mr. S.Raza Ahmad, AAG5
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
ORAL JUDGMENT
Date : 23-06-2026
1. The Writ petition is field for the
following reliefs:
“(I). For issuance of an
appropriate writ, order or direction
for quashing the arbitrary and
discriminatory selection for
allotment of the Fair Price Shops
(P.D.S dealership) of Beldaur of
Khagaria District as the same
Patna High Court CWJC No.21272 of 2019 dt.23-06-2026
2/4
relates to the petitioners.
(II). For issuance of an
appropriate writ, order of direction
for allotment of the P.D.S.
dealership in favour of petitioner
who is the best candidates
amongst the lot.
(III). For issuance of an
appropriate writ, order or direction
for grant of ad-interim stay of the
operation of arbitrary selection for
allotment of P.D.S. dealer and
restocining the respondent
authority in grant of the fair price
shop during the pendency of this
writ application.
(IV). For issuance of an appropriate
writ, order or direction for grant of
any other appropriate reliefs for
which petitioner may be deemed
entitled in the facts and
circumstances of the case.”
2. At this juncture, the Learned counsel
for the respondents contended that Section 32(vi)
of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System
(Control) Order, 2016 provides for the provision of
revision. Section 32(v) and (vi) read as follows:
“32. (v) Till the disposal
of appeal pending, the Appellate
Authority may direct that the order
under appeal shall not take effect
for such period as the authority
may consider necessary for giving
a reasonable opportunity to the
other party under sub-clause (4) or
until the appeal is disposed of,
whichever is earlier.
Patna High Court CWJC No.21272 of 2019 dt.23-06-2026
3/4
(vi) Due to non disposal
of the appeal within sixty days by
the District Officer or against the
order passed in the appeal, a
revision may be filed before the
Divisional Commissioner. The
revision shall be disposed of within
two months.”
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner
contended that he intends to file a revision before
the Divisional Commissioner, but the limitation
period for filing the revision has lapsed. He prayed
for a direction to the concerned Divisional
Commissioner to entertain the revision petition in
accordance with Section 5 of the Limitation Act.
4. Taking into consideration that the
petitioner has an alternative remedy for filing a
revision, the writ petition is disposed of with a
direction to the petitioner to file the revision
petition within four weeks from the date of receipt
of this order before the Divisional Commissioner.
The delay in filing the revision shall be condoned
by the Divisional Commissioner, and the authority
shall dispose of the revision within three months
from the date of filing of the revision petition.
Patna High Court CWJC No.21272 of 2019 dt.23-06-2026
4/4
5. With the above said observation, the
Writ petition is disposed of.
6. Interlocutory Application(s), if any,
shall stand disposed of.
(G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
Shanu/-
AFR/NAFR NAFR
CAV DATE NA
Uploading Date
Transmission Date NA
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.