Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manoranjan Kumar PandeyversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

Decided
Disposal
DISMISS FOR NON-PROSECUTION

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed for default and non‑prosecution due to the petitioner’s failure to appear.

Summary

Manoranjan Kumar Pandey filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court against the State of Bihar and others. The petitioner failed to appear or file any representation on the scheduled dates of 09-12-2024 and 09-01-2026. The Court noted the absence of representation despite a prior order granting a final indulgence to appear on 09-01-2026. Consequently, the Court exercised its inherent power to dismiss the petition for default and non‑prosecution. The dismissal was pronounced by Justice G. Anupama Chakravarthy, and no further hearing was ordered.

Issues considered

  • What is the appropriate consequence when a petitioner fails to appear or file any representation in a civil writ petition?

Subjects

  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • default dismissal
  • non‑prosecution
  • patna high court
  • petitioner's absence

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21460 of 2013
                  ======================================================
                  Manoranjan Kumar Pandey

                                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                        Versus
                  The State Of Bihar and Ors

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s     :        None
                  For the Respondent/s     :        Mr. Prabhakar Jha, GP-27
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY
                                        ORAL ORDER

5    09-01-2026                 1. This Court has passed a detailed oral

                    order on 08.01.2026 which reads as follows:-

                                               “No      representation           for     the

                                petitioner on 09.12.2024 as well as

                                today. As a last indulgence, list on

                                09.01.2026.”

                                2. Inspite of it, today also, there is no

                    representation             on      behalf       of     the     petitioner.

                    Therefore, the Writ petition is dismissed for default

                    and for non-prosecution.



                                         (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
amitkr/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.