Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Shashi Bhushan SinghversusThe Union Of India and Ors

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The writ petition is devoid of merit and is dismissed.

Summary

The petitioner applied for the post of Constable/Fire in the CISF and cleared the physical and written tests. He was declared medically unfit in the initial medical examination and was given an opportunity to appeal, which he did by submitting a private medical fitness certificate after corrective surgery. The respondents directed him to appear for a review medical examination, but he failed to report, leading to his absence being recorded. The petitioner claimed the respondents acted arbitrarily by not issuing an appointment letter, while the respondents argued that medical fitness is a mandatory prerequisite and the private certificate could not be accepted. The court found that the petitioner was afforded all reasonable opportunities and that the respondents acted in accordance with the recruitment rules, concluding that the writ petition lacked merit. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to appointment despite being declared medically unfit and failing to appear for the review medical examination.
  • Whether the respondents' refusal to issue an appointment letter amounts to arbitrariness or violation of natural justice.
  • Whether a private medical fitness certificate can be accepted under the CISC recruitment rules.

Subjects

  • recruitment
  • medical fitness
  • CISF
  • writ petition
  • natural justice
  • appointment
  • eligibility

Judgment

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                  Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21793 of 2013
     ======================================================
     Shashi Bhushan Singh Son Of Anil Kumar Singh Resident Of Village and
     P.O. Barka Dumra, P.S. Muffasil, Ara, District - Bhojpur At Ara

                                                       ... ... Petitioner/s
                                  Versus
1.   The Union Of India through the Director General, Central Industrial
     Security Force, New Delhi
2.   The Inspector General, Cisf, Eastern Zone Head Quarter, New Patliputra
     Colony, Patna - 13
3.   The Assistant Commandant, Cisf, Eastern Zone Head Quarter, New
     Patlipura Colony, Patna - 13
4.   The Chief Medical Officer, (CMO) (SG), CISF, MPRTC, Anantpura, Behror
     (Raj)

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :     Mr. Nityanand Mishra, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :     M/s R.K.Sharma, CGC
                                  Lokesh
                                  A.K.Pandey, SCGC
     ======================================================
        CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. G. ANUPAMA CHAKRAVARTHY

                                ORAL JUDGMENT
                                Date : 31-01-2026

                     1. The present Writ petition is filed for

      the following reliefs:

                                     a) For issuance of writ in

                        the nature of mandamus directing /

                        commanding              the        respondent

                        concerned         to     issue       offer    of

                        appointment letter to the petitioner

                        and appoint him on the post of

                        Constable       /Fire     in     CISF      under
Patna High Court CWJC No.21793 of 2013 dt.31-01-2026
                                           2/12




                            Employment no. 32023/Constable /

                            Fire       Recruitment-2012               Eastern

                            Sector, CISF for which the petitioner

                            selected in Physical test, written

                            test and medical test and finally fit

                            for    the     said        post   vide    medical

                            fitness certificate dated 11.5.2013

                            and       rectified         the   error        dated

                            4.7.2013 as contained in Annexure

                            2(series) and 4(series) to this writ

                            application.

                                           b)          For    directing        /

                            commanding                  the     respondent

                            concerned                    to           consider

                            sympathetically and according to

                            merit        the      candidature         of     the

                            petitioner for which the petitioner is

                            entitled to in accordance with law

                            because the matter relates to the

                            life and career of the petitioner. If

                            the candidature of the petitioner

                            may not be considered, then the
Patna High Court CWJC No.21793 of 2013 dt.31-01-2026
                                           3/12




                            petitioner will suffers a lot and

                            deprive from his Future career.

                                           c)          For      any     other

                            relief/reliefs for which the petitioner

                            is entitled to in accordance with law.



                        2. The brief facts, as culled out from the

         writ petition, are that the petitioner applied for the

         post      of     Constable/Fire               in    CISF   pursuant    to

         Employment              Notice         No.         32023/Constable/Fire

         Recruitment–2012 (Eastern Sector). The petitioner

         successfully qualified in the Physical test as well as

         the written examination, securing selection on

         merit. Thereafter, the petitioner appeared in the

         medical examination conducted for recruitment to

         the post of Constable/Fire in CISF. In the Review

         Medical Examination held on 07.05.2013 at CISF

         2nd Reserve Battalion, Ranchi, Jharkhand and was

         declared medically unfit on the ground of “Single

         testis on right side of scrotum and undescended

         testis in left inguinal canal.”

                        3. It is submitted in the Writ petition that
Patna High Court CWJC No.21793 of 2013 dt.31-01-2026
                                           4/12




         the petitioner was granted 15 days’ time to submit

         a medical fitness certificate, as per Form No. CISF

         (Constable)/3; so as to reach the addressee within

         a period of 15 days from the date of medical

         examination i.e., on or before 22.05.2013 for which

         a Memorandum unfit letter dated 07.05.2013 was

         issued by respondent No. 4. Pursuant thereto, the

         petitioner consulted Dr. B. Kumar, Consultant

         Surgeon, Raj Hospital, Ranchi, and underwent

         operative         correction          surgery       on   10.05.2013,

         whereby the left testis was brought down to the

         root of the scrotum. A medical fitness certificate

         dated 11.05.2013 was issued by the said doctor.

                        4. Thereafter, the petitioner preferred an

         appeal          before           Respondent          No.       2    on

         16.05.2013against medical unfitness within the

         prescribed time, enclosing the medical fitness

         certificate dated 11.05.2013. Subsequently, the

         Assistant Commandant (respondent no.3) issued a

         letter     dated       28.06.2013,            pointing   out   certain

         discrepancies              in the medical certificate and

         directed        for       rectification        in   Form   No.     CISF
Patna High Court CWJC No.21793 of 2013 dt.31-01-2026
                                           5/12




         (Constable)/3 Column no. 2 Form No. 1, disclosing

         all the reasons for medical unfitness. In compliance

         thereof, the petitioner again consulted the same

         medical practitioner, and a rectified Medical Fitness

         Certificate dated 04.07.2013 was issued, duly

         addressing             all     objections       raised     by    the

         respondents.             The       petitioner    forwarded       the

         rectified medical certificate to respondent no.2 on

         08.07.2013 through speed post. However, no

         response or decision has been communicated to

         the petitioner till date, nor has any appointment

         letter been issued.

                        5. The petitioner asserts that he is

         medically fit, has cleared all stages of the selection

         process on merit, and is ready and willing to serve

         as Constable/Fire in CISF.

                        6. The Learned counsel for the petitioner

         submits         that     the      petitioner    has      successfully

         qualified in the physical test, written examination,

         and medical examination after rectification and,

         therefore, is entitled to appointment on the post of

         Constable/Fire in CISF. It is submitted that the initial
Patna High Court CWJC No.21793 of 2013 dt.31-01-2026
                                           6/12




         declaration of medical unfitness was temporary

         and      curable,         and       the       petitioner   underwent

         corrective surgery within the stipulated time and

         submitted the requisite medical fitness certificate

         well within the prescribed period. The Learned

         counsel further submits that upon objection raised

         by the respondents, the petitioner fully complied

         with     the directions by submitting a                       rectified

         medical         certificate        dated        04.07.2013,      clearly

         mentioning all relevant medical particulars.                       It is

         further submitted that despite full compliance and

         fulfillment         of     all     eligibility      conditions,     the

         respondents have failed to take any decision,

         which amounts to arbitrary and colourable exercise

         of power. It is contended that the inaction of the

         respondents has caused irreparable loss to the

         petitioner,        affecting        his       livelihood   and    future

         career, and is violative of the principles of natural

         justice, and therefore, prays to allow the Writ

         petition for the relief sought.

                        7. A detailed counter affidavit has been

         filed on behalf of the respondents denying the
Patna High Court CWJC No.21793 of 2013 dt.31-01-2026
                                           7/12




         allegations made in the Writ petition.

                        8. It is stated in the counter affidavit that

         applications were invited for filling up the posts of

         Constable/Fire (Male) in CISF pursuant to Force

         Headquarters letter No. E-32023(1)/13/2012/Rectt/

         Constable Fire /1340                 dated 06.06.2012, and the

         closing date for receipt of applications for the

         Eastern Zone was fixed on 18.07.2012. The CISF

         Eastern        Sector       Headquarters,         Patna,        was   the

         application         receiving         authority     for     candidates

         belonging to State of Bihar, Jharkhand and Odisha.

         The petitioner, having the requisite qualifications,

         applied for the said post. His application was found

         in order and he was allotted Roll No. 050118300.

         He      qualified        the      PST/PET       and       the    written

         examination, and his name appeared in the merit

         list.    Accordingly,          he        was   called     for   medical

         examination at CISF 2nd Reserve Battalion, Ranchi,

         on 07.05.2013.

                        9.      Upon        medical       examination,         the

         petitioner was declared medically unfit on the

         ground of “Single testis on right side of scrotum
Patna High Court CWJC No.21793 of 2013 dt.31-01-2026
                                           8/12




         and undescended testis in left inguinal canal” and

         a Memorandum of Unfitness was issued dated

         07.05.2013, granting him liberty to prefer an

         appeal within 15 days.

                        10. The petitioner preferred an appeal

         along with a medical fitness certificate, which was

         considered by the Appellate Authority. The appeal

         was accepted and the petitioner was issued a call-

         up letter dated 24.07.2013 directing him to appear

         for Review Medical Examination on 07.08.2013 at

         CISF 2nd Reserve Battalion, Ranchi. However, the

         petitioner failed to report for the Review Medical

         Examination and was marked absent, which was

         duly recorded in his Individual Record Sheet. Since

         medical fitness is an essential eligibility and is a

         pre-condition under the recruitment notification.

         The petitioner did not appear before the Review

         Medical Board, his medical fitness could not be

         assessed.

                        11. It is further stated that though the

         initial medical fitness certificate submitted by the

         petitioner        was       defective,        he   was   given   an
Patna High Court CWJC No.21793 of 2013 dt.31-01-2026
                                           9/12




         opportunity to rectify the same vide letter dated

         28.06.2013. Despite due intimation, the petitioner

         did not appear for Review Medical Examination.

                        12. It is contended that the respondents

         have       acted       strictly      in       accordance            with    the

         recruitment           rules       and         notification,         but     the

         petitioner,          failed       to          qualify        the     medical

         examination            and       was          not     issued        with    an

         appointment            letter,      and        therefore       prayed        to

         dismiss the Writ petition.

                        13. Heard the Learned counsel for the

         petitioner as well as the Learned counsel for the

         respondents. Perused the records.

                        14. It is not in dispute that the petitioner

         was      declared         medically           unfit     in    the    medical

         examination conducted on 07.05.2013 at CISF 2nd

         Reserve Battalion, Ranchi, on the ground of “Single

         testis on right side of scrotum and undescended

         testis in left inguinal canal”, as recorded by Dr. N.C.

         Hessa, C.M.O., CISF RTC Behror (SG). Consequently,

         the petitioner was issued a Memorandum of

         Unfitness               dated                 07.05.2013                  (Form
Patna High Court CWJC No.21793 of 2013 dt.31-01-2026
                                          10/12




         CISF(Constable)/1), informing him of his right to

         prefer an appeal for Review Medical Examination

         within the stipulated period of 15 days, failing

         which his candidature was liable to be cancelled.

                        15. It is also not in dispute that the

         petitioner         availed        the         said   opportunity      and

         preferred an appeal along with a medical fitness

         certificate dated 04.07.2013 but did not appear

         before the Review Medical Examination. Upon

         consideration           of    the     medical        documents,        the

         Appellate         Authority        accepted          the    appeal    and

         accordingly           issued         a        call-up      letter    dated

         24.07.2013 directing the petitioner to report for

         Review Medical Examination on 07.08.2013 at

         0700 hours at CISF 2nd Reserve Battalion, Ranchi.

                        16. The counter affidavit categorically

         disclose that the petitioner failed to report for the

         Review Medical Examination on the scheduled date

         and was marked absent, which was duly endorsed

         in the Individual Record Sheet by the supervising

         officer, namely Shri B.K. Chauhan, Commandant,

         CISF Unit, KhSTPP Kahalgaon. This assertion has
Patna High Court CWJC No.21793 of 2013 dt.31-01-2026
                                          11/12




         not been effectively controverted by the petitioner.

                        17. In the absence of the petitioner’s

         appearance before the Review Medical Board, his

         medical fitness could not be assessed, thereby

         leaving        the     essential         eligibility   condition    for

         appointment unfulfilled. As per the recruitment

         notification,         medical         fitness    is    a   mandatory

         prerequisite          for    appointment          to   the   post   of

         Constable/Fire. Moreover, the Medical certificate

         issued by a private doctor, cannot be considered,

         as per the rules of recruitment.

                        18. This Court finds that the petitioner

         was afforded adequate and reasonable opportunity

         at every stage of the recruitment process. The

         respondents acted strictly in accordance with the

         recruitment rules, procedure, and notification, and

         no arbitrariness, illegality, or violation of principles

         of natural justice is discernible.

                        19. Taking into consideration the entire

         material available on record and the submissions

         advanced by learned counsel for both the parties,

         this Court is of the considered view that the writ
             Patna High Court CWJC No.21793 of 2013 dt.31-01-2026
                                                       12/12




                      petition is devoid of merit.

                                     20.      Accordingly,          the writ petition   is

                      dismissed.

                                     21. Interlocutory Application(s), if any,

                      shall stand disposed of.




                                         (G. Anupama Chakravarthy, J)
Spd/-
AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          31.01.2026
Transmission Date


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.