Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pujya Bhadanta Harshbodhi,versusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court directed the petitioner to file a detailed representation and the respondent to dispose of the grievance with a reasoned order within specified timeframes.

Summary

The petitioner, President of two public trusts, filed a writ petition alleging that the District Magistrate (respondent No.2) demolished a temporary welcome gate erected for a Buddha Purnima event without prior notice or authorization, causing a loss of Rs. 20,450. The petitioner claimed no remedial action was taken despite representations. The Court examined whether the demolition constituted an unlawful administrative act warranting judicial intervention. It held that the petitioner should be given a further opportunity to make a detailed representation to the respondent. Accordingly, the Court directed the petitioner to file a representation within two weeks and the respondent to decide the grievance with a reasoned order within six weeks, disposing of the application.

Issues considered

  • Whether the demolition of a temporary welcome gate by the District Magistrate without notice or authorization amounts to an unlawful administrative action justifying a writ of mandamus.
  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to relief directing the respondent to consider and decide the grievance within a stipulated time.

Subjects

  • writ jurisdiction
  • public trust
  • administrative action
  • demolition
  • temporary structure
  • Mahabodhi
  • representation

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                               Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2350 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Pujya Bhadanta Harshbodhi, Resident of C/o Umesh Yadav, New Tarodi,
                 Bhagalpur, Bodhgaya, Bihar-824231.

                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The District Magistrate, Collectorate Building, Bodhgaya, Bihar.
           3.    The Executive Officer, Bodhgaya Nagar Parishad, Mahabodhi Temple Road,
                 Bodhgaya, Bihar-824231.
           4.    Secretary, the Mahabodhi Mahavihar Management Committee Mahabodhi
                 Temple, Bodhgaya, Bihar-824231.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr.Parth Sarthy, Adv.
                 For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.Ramadhar Singh, G.P.-25.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJ KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   08-07-2026                    1. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and

                   the learned counsel for the respondents/State.

                               2. The present writ application has been filed alleging,

                   inter alia, that the petitioner happens to be the President of two

                   public trusts, namely, Dr. Ambedkar International Buddhist

                   Parliament, registered vide PTR No. 486, and Mahabodhi

                   Charitable Trust, registered vide PTR No. Mah. E-1278(N). It is

                   further submitted that, on the occasion of Buddha Purnima

                   (Vaishakhi Purnima) on 23rd May, 2024, four temporary

                   welcome gates were erected on 17th May, 2024, one of which

                   was situated near the Mahabodhi Mahavihar, opposite the

                   BTMC Office, Bodhgaya. It is next submitted that the petitioner
        Patna High Court CWJC No.2350 of 2025(2) dt.08-07-2026
                                                    2/2




                  incurred an expense of Rs. 20,450/- for constructing these

                  welcome gates, which were an integral part of the event, but all

                  of a sudden, on 21st May, 2024, without any prior notice and

                  without any instruction or authorization, respondent no. 2

                  unlawfully demolished one of the welcome gates near the

                  Mahabodhi Mahavihar.

                              3. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted

                  that he has represented before the authorities, but no action

                  whatsoever has been taken.

                              4. In the background of these facts, this Court thinks it

                  proper to grant liberty to the petitioner to file a detailed

                  representation before respondent no. 2 within a period of two

                  weeks from today, and thereafter respondent no. 2 shall proceed

                  to decide and dispose of the grievance of the petitioner by a

                  reasoned order within a period of six weeks from the date of

                  filing of such representation.

                              5. The application stand disposed of with the above

                  said observations/directions.


                                               (Raj Kumar, J)

Nirmal/AKV
U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.