Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Sanjai Kumar RaiversusThe State Of Bihar and Ors

Decided
Disposal
ALLOWED

Holding

The court held that the petitioner is entitled to payment of salary for the period 23 June 1986 to 28 September 1996 and directed the respondents to make such payment.

Summary

The petitioner, Sanjai Kumar Rai, an untrained compounder employed at Prabhas Chikitsalaya since 1984, claimed that he was denied salary for the period 23 June 1986 to 2 October 1996 after the hospital was taken over by the State of Bihar. An earlier writ petition (C.W.J.C. No.10249 of 2005) was disposed with a direction to approach the Principal Secretary, who later acknowledged the petitioner’s service for pension calculations but did not order salary payment. The petitioner argued that the same relief granted to Smt. Indu Kumari should apply to him, seeking arrears of salary for the same period. The State contended that the earlier order already settled the matter and that salary could not be awarded. The High Court examined the records, noted the omission of a salary order despite recognition of service, and held that the authority was obliged to pay the arrears. Consequently, the court directed the respondents to pay the petitioner his salary for the period 23 June 1986 to 28 September 1996 within three months. The petition was allowed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to payment of salary arrears for the period 23 June 1986 to 28 September 1996 despite a prior order counting his service only for pension benefits.
  • Whether the failure of the Principal Secretary to order salary payment violates the petitioner’s service rights under applicable service rules.
  • Whether the relief granted to Smt. Indu Kumari is applicable to the petitioner.

Subjects

  • service benefits
  • salary arrears
  • pension
  • writ petition
  • public service
  • health department
  • untrained compounder

Judgment

          IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.23914 of 2013
     ======================================================
     Sanjai Kumar Rai S/O Surendra Rai Resident Of Village And P.O- Kursaha,
     P.S- Mohiuddin Nagar, District- Samastipur , Presently Posted At Additional
     Primary Health Centre, Gajpati, Hasanpur, Samastipur.

                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s
                                       Versus
1.   The State Of Bihar
2.   The Director In Chief, Health Services, Government Of Bihar, Patna.
3.   The Secretary, Health, Medical Education And Family Welfare, Department,
     Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.
4.   The District Magistrate, Samastipur.
5.   The Civil Surgeon- Cum Chief Medical Officer, Samastipur.
6.   The Incharge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Gajpati, Hasanpur,
     Samastipur.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner    :       Mr. Dhananjai Kumar Singh, Advocate
                                   Mr. Jyoti Ranjan Jha, Advocate
     For the State         :       Mr. Ajay Bihari Sinha, G.A.-8
     ======================================================
     CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
     ORAL JUDGMENT
      Date : 16-06-2026

                     Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

                     2. The present writ petition has been filed for the

      following reliefs:

                     “Further be pleased to direct the respondents to

      grant, the same relief(s), as granted to Smt. Indu Kumari,

      A.N.M., from the date of his appointment, i.e w.e.f. 1.9.1984,

      alongwith all consequential benefits.

                     Further be pleased to grant any other relief(s), for

      which the petitioner is otherwise entitled in the facts and
Patna High Court CWJC No.23914 of 2013 dt.16-06-2026
                                           2/7




         circumstances of the case.”

             SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PETITIONER

                       3. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the

         petitioner submits that the petitioner was working as untrained

         compounder in Prabhas Chikitsalaya, Kursaha, Samastipur

         w.e.f. 01.09.1984. The said hospital was taken over by the State

         of Bihar on 23.07.1986. When the petitioner was denied salary

         for the period 23.07.1986 to 02.10.1996, he was constrained to

         file a writ petition bearing C.W.J.C. No.10249 of 2005. The writ

         petition preferred by the petitioner was heard by a Hon’ble

         Single Judge of this Court and vide order dated 06.08.2010,

         while recording the facts, the Hon’ble Single Judge was pleased

         to dispose of the writ petition with a liberty to the petitioner to

         approach the Principal Secretary, Health Department by filing a

         compact representation enclosing all the relevant documents and

         a copy of the order dated 06.08.2010. The authority concerned

         was directed to take final decision strictly in accordance with

         law within a period of six months from the date of filing of such

         representation by the petitioner. It was further observed that the

         Court has not gone into the merits of the case and therefore it

         would be open for the competent authority to decide the matter

         strictly in accordance with law. Pursuant thereto, the petitioner
Patna High Court CWJC No.23914 of 2013 dt.16-06-2026
                                           3/7




         filed his representation before the Principal Secretary,

         Department of Health, Government of Bihar, Patna and

         whereafter vide Memo No.1419(4), dated 14.09.2012, issued

         under the signature of the Principal Secretary, Department of

         Health, Government of Bihar, a reasoned and speaking order

         was passed. He submits that in para-5, the Principal Secretary

         proceeded to record that “pwafd flfoy ltZu] leLrhiqj ds i=

         fnukad&12-11-1992 }kjk ;g izfrosfnr fd;k x;k gS fd ;kfpdkdrkZ lat;

         dqekj jk; dk uke vf/kxzg.k dh lwph esa “kkfey djus Fkk ijUrq lacaf/kr

         vkS’k/kky; dk vf/kxzg.k fnukad 23-06-1986 esa gh gqvk gS vkSj ml le; Jh jk;

         mDr vkS’k/kky; esa fu;qfDr ,oa dk;Zjr Fks tks lfpo] izHkkjh fpfdRlky; ds i=

         fnukad&11-10-82 tks lfpo] LokLF; foHkkx] fcgkj] iVuk dks izsf’kr djus ls Hkh

         Li’V gks tkrk gSA ,slh fLFkfr esa vizf”kf{kr feJd ds :i essa ekuuh; mPp

         U;k;ky; ds vkns”k ds vkyksd esa Jh jk; dk vH;kosnu Lohdkj djrs gq, bUgsa

         fnukad&23-06-1986 ds izHkko ls lek;ksftr djus dk vkns”k ikfjr fd;k tkrk

         gSA bl (fnukad&23-06-86 ls 28-09-1996) vof/k dh x.kuk ekuuh; U;k;ky; ds

         vkns”k ds vkyksd esa dsoy isa”kukfn ykHk ds fy, dh tk;sxhA”

                       4. The learned counsel for the petitioner further

         submits that the Principal Secretary came to the conclusion that

         from the date of take over of the hospital i.e. 23.06.1986 to

         28.09.1996, the petitioner was working in the said hospital and

         therefore he proceeded to pass the order to treat the services of

         the petitioner for the period 23.06.1986 to 28.09.1996 for the
Patna High Court CWJC No.23914 of 2013 dt.16-06-2026
                                           4/7




         purposes of calculation of pension and other benefits related to

         pension. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

         when      the    Principal      Secretary,    Department   of   Health,

         Government of Bihar found the petitioner to be working in the

         hospital in question for the period 23.06.1986 to 28.09.1996, it

         was incumbent upon him to direct for payment of salary for the

         said period, however no such order was passed by the Principal

         Secretary and reference has been given to the order dated

         06.08.2010, passed in C.W.J.C. No.10249 of 2005, while

         passing the order with regard to counting the above mentioned

         period for payment of pension etc. He submits that by the said

         order dated 06.08.2010, it was left open to the respondent

         authorities to take decision with regard to payment of salary for

         the period 23.06.1986 to 28.09.1996, however no decision was

         taken by the authorities concerned on the prayer of the petitioner

         for making payment of salary for the said period. He submits

         that the petitioner is entitled for payment of salary for the period

         mentioned above, since admittedly he has worked as untrained

         compounder in the hospital in question. He further submits that

         similar relief has already been granted to one Indu Kumari,

         A.N.M., who was also working in the same hospital, from the

         date of her initial appointment, i.e., 01.09.1984.
Patna High Court CWJC No.23914 of 2013 dt.16-06-2026
                                           5/7




           SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE RESPONDENTS

                       5. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing on

         behalf of the State submits that in terms of the order dated

         06.08.2010, passed in C.W.J.C. No.10249 of 2005, the period

         from 23.06.1986 to 28.09.1996 has already been counted for the

         purposes of giving pension and other benefits to the petitioner.

         He further submits that the prayer of the petitioner for making

         payment of salary was already denied by order dated

         06.08.2010, passed in C.W.J.C. No.10249 of 2005 and, therefore

         the Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government of

         Bihar has rightly not passed any order on payment of salary for

         the said period.

                             ANALYSIS & CONCLUSION

                       6. Having heard the learned counsel for the parties

         and after going through the records, it appears that the petitioner

         was not being granted the benefit of his service for the period

         23.07.1986 to 02.10.1996, including payment of arrears of

         salary for the said period. The petitioner preferred a writ petition

         bearing C.W.J.C. No.10249 of 2005. The writ petition filed by

         the petitioner was disposed of by a learned Co-ordinate Bench

         of this Court vide order dated 06.08.2010, whereby while giving

         liberty to the petitioner to represent before the Principal
Patna High Court CWJC No.23914 of 2013 dt.16-06-2026
                                           6/7




         Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar, the

         learned Co-ordinate Bench further observed that it would be

         open for the competent authority to decide the matter strictly in

         accordance with law, since no decision has been taken by the

         learned Co-ordinate Bench on the merits of the case. It further

         appears that the Principal Secretary, Department of Health,

         Government of Bihar while passing the order, on the

         representation filed by the petitioner on 14.09.2012, while

         taking note of the fact that the petitioner was working for the

         period 23.06.1986 to 28.09.1996, allowed the benefits of

         counting his service for the said period for the purposes of

         making payment of pension and pensionary benefits, however

         he did not utter a single word with regard to payment of salary

         to the petitioner for the said period.

                       7. In the considered opinion of this Court when the

         Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Government of Bihar

         came to the conclusion that the petitioner has worked in the

         hospital in question from 23.06.1986 and he has treated the said

         period, i.e. 23.06.1986 to 28.09.1996 for grant of service related

         benefits, i.e., for payment of pension and other benefits, then it

         was incumbent upon him to pass orders with regard to payment

         of salary to the petitioner for the said period, however for the
             Patna High Court CWJC No.23914 of 2013 dt.16-06-2026
                                                        7/7




                      reasons best known to him, he did not pass any order on the said

                      aspect. It has been informed at the Bar that the petitioner has

                      retired on 28.02.2026.

                                     8. Accordingly, the writ petition is allowed with a

                      direction to the respondent authorities to make payment of

                      salary to the petitioner for the period 23.06.1986 to 28.09.1996,

                      since the same has been found to be the period, petitioner was

                      working in the hospital in question, by the Principal Secretary

                      vide his order contained in Memo No.1419(4), dated

                      14.09.2012, within a period of three months from the date of

                      receipt/production of a copy of the order.

                                     9. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand

                      disposed of.


                                                  (Ritesh Kumar, J.)

Sanjay/-

AFR/NAFR                NAFR
CAV DATE                NA
Uploading Date          17.06.2026
Transmission Date       NA


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.