Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Gomatee InfrastructureversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court permitted the petitioner to withdraw the writ application and ordered the petition to stand disposed with liberty to approach the appropriate authority.

Summary

Gomatee Infrastructure, through its proprietor Renu Devi, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ application and to approach the appropriate authority or court thereafter. The learned counsel for the petitioner requested this liberty. The Court, after hearing, granted permission to withdraw the writ and ordered that the present application stand disposed with liberty to approach the appropriate forum. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed and any pending applications, if any, were also ordered to stand disposed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a petitioner may be permitted to withdraw a civil writ petition and be given liberty to approach the appropriate authority or court thereafter

Subjects

  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • withdrawal of petition
  • procedural liberty
  • Patna High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2443 of 2025
                 ======================================================
                 Gomatee Infrastructure through its Proprietor Renu Devi, Female, aged about
                 55 years, Wife of Shyam Dev Sah, Resident of Dholbajja, Ward No. 04, P.S.
                 Forbesganj, District Araria, Bihar.

                                                                       ... ... Petitioner
                                                 Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Works
                 Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Engineer In-Chief, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar,
                 Patna.
           3.    The Chief Engineer-4, Rural Works Department, Government of Bihar,
                 Patna.
           4.    The Superintending Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Circle
                 Kishanganj, Bihar.
           5.    The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division
                 Kishanganj - 1, District Kishanganj, Bihar.
           6.    The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division
                 Kishanganj - 2, District Kishanganj, Bihar.
           7.    The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Works Division
                 Forbishganj, District- Forbishganj, Bihar.
           8.    Shiv Shakti Construction through its Proprietor Shiv Shankar Kumar, Son of
                 Kishandas, Resident of Ward No. 12, Nirpur, P.O. and P.S. Jogbani, District
                 Araria, Bihar, 854328.

                                                           ... ... Respondents
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner    :      Mr. Prabhat Ranjan, Advocate
                 For the State         :      Mr. Amish Kumar, J.C. to A.G.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH)

6   04-05-2026                  Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to

                   withdraw the present writ application with a liberty to approach

                   the appropriate authority/court.

                                2. Permission is accorded.
          Patna High Court CWJC No.2443 of 2025(6) dt.04-05-2026
                                                      2/2




                                3. Accordingly, the present writ application stands

                    disposed of with the aforesaid liberty.

                                4. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand

                    disposed of.




                                                            (Sudhir Singh, J)


                                                       ( Shailendra Singh, J)

U.K./-B.K.S.
U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.