Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Kunal KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Director of Mines and Geology must obtain a ground report from the Collector and pass a reasoned order after hearing all parties before allowing sand excavation at Maura Sand Ghat.

Summary

The petitioner, Kunal Kumar, filed a writ petition seeking a mandamus to restrain sand excavation at Maura Sand Ghat in Jamui, alleging that the mining harms the waterbody and local farmers. The Collector had earlier highlighted these concerns, but the Mines and Geology Department settled the sand ghat with respondent No.5 and issued a work order. The court observed that the settlement should be reviewed by the Director of Mines and Geology, who must hear all parties, obtain a ground report from the Collector, and pass a reasoned order. The court directed the Director to procure the report and decide the matter promptly. Consequently, the petition was disposed of without granting the reliefs sought.

Issues considered

  • Whether the court can issue a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to halt sand excavation pending a hearing.
  • Whether the settlement of the sand ghat with respondent No.5 is valid in view of environmental and farmers' interests under the Mines and Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957.
  • Whether the Director of Mines and Geology must consider representations and a ground report before authorising sand mining.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • sand mining
  • environmental protection
  • mandamus
  • waterbody
  • farmers' rights
  • Mines and Minerals Act
  • public interest litigation

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2617 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 Kunal Kumar Son of Pravin Kumar @ Pravin Kumar Singh Resident of
                 village- Dhob Ghat, P.O.- Gidhaur, Police Station- Khaira, District- Jamui.

                                                                        ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Mines and Geology
                 Department, Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Director, Mines and Geology Department, Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Jamui.
           4.    The District Mining Officer, Jamui.
           5.    Gagan Kumar, Son of name not known, Resident of village- Sikandra,
                 Police Station and District- Jamui.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Jitendra Prasad Singh, Senior Advocate
                                               Mr. Varun Krishna Singh, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Addl. Advocate General (04)
                 For the Mines          :      Mr. Naresh Dikshit, Spl.P.P.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   23-04-2026                   Heard Learned Senior counsel for the petitioner,

                   learned counsel for the Mines Department beside the State.

                                 2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   following relief(s):

                                             “A. For issuance of a writ in the nature

                                    of mandamus directing the respondents not to

                                    excavate Sand from Maura Sand Ghat (River

                                    Barnal) situated at Gram Panchayat, Maura,

                                    Block-Gidhaur within the district of Jamui which

                                    has been settled in favour of Respondent No.5 with
Patna High Court CWJC No.2617 of 2026(2) dt.23-04-2026
                                            2/4




                          work order effected from 31.12.2025 as the same is

                          against the interest of waterbody as well as

                          farmers of the locality.

                                      B. For restraining the respondent No.5

                          from excavation of the Sand from the Maura Sand

                          Ghat, Gidhaur, Jamui in violation of the terms and

                          conditions stipulated under the tendered document

                          as well as in violation of the Mines and Minerals

                          (Development and Regulation) Act, 1957 and

                          Rules, 2017 framed under the Act.

                                      C. For direction to the respondents to

                          consider and decide the representation filed by the

                          petitioner and other villagers including farmers of

                          the locality ventilating their grievances in this

                          regard.

                                      D. For grant any other relief/reliefs for

                          which the petitioner is legally entitled in the facts

                          and circumstances of the case.”

                      3. Despite the fact that the Collector, Jamui made

          correspondence with the Director, Mines and Minerals

          Department, Bihar, Patna vide memo no. 419 dated 07.06.2018

          highlighting the issue of the locals that sand mining (Maura
Patna High Court CWJC No.2617 of 2026(2) dt.23-04-2026
                                            3/4




          Sand Ghat in the district of Jamui) will affect the movement of

          the water/farmers, the concerned department has once again

          settled the said Ghat with respondent no. 5.

                      4. Learned counsel for the Mines Department submits

          that as the admitted fact is that the Ghat has been settled with

          respondent no. 5, it would be appropriate that the petitioner

          move before the Director, Mines and Geology Department

          (respondent no. 2) who shall be hearing all the parties including

          the    District      Officials/Collector,      Jamui   and/or   his/her

          representative and the respondent no. 5 before taking a decision.

                      5. The learned Spl.P.P. Mines has made a valid and

          just point, the local officials as also the respondent no. 5 in

          whose favour the land has been settled have to be noticed, and

          thereafter, a decision has to be taken.

                      6. This Court is further of the opinion that the

          Director Mines and Geology Department, Bihar, Patna must get

          a ground report from the Collector, Jamui in the matter before

          taking a decision and a reasoned order has to be passed at an

          earliest.

                      7. Learned State counsel submits that a letter will also

          sent to the office of the Collector, Jamui to take cognizance of

          the matter and if required, to submit a detailed inquiry report to
          Patna High Court CWJC No.2617 of 2026(2) dt.23-04-2026
                                                      4/4




                    be presented before the Director, Mines and Geology

                    Department, Bihar, Patna.

                                8. The writ petition stands disposed of with the

                    aforesaid observation.



                                                  (Rajiv Roy, J)
Adnan/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.