Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Puja KumariversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Puja Kumari filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court. No counsel appeared on her behalf on the hearing date. The State of Bihar and other respondents were represented by standing counsel. The petitioner, through the mentioning slip, requested withdrawal of the writ petition. The Court noted the absence of representation and the withdrawal request. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition can be dismissed on the ground of withdrawal by the petitioner

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2724 of 2025
                  ======================================================
                  Puja Kumari Daughter of Rabindra Kumar Pathak, Resident of Village-
                  Kumbhi Ward No. 13, P.S.- Warisaliganj, District- Nawada.
                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus

             1.   The State of Bihar through the Law Secretary, Law Department, Govt. of
                  Bihar, having its office at Old Secretariat, Patna.
             2.   The learned Registrar General of High Court of Judicature at Patna, Patna
                  High Court.
             3.   The Convenor Centralized Selection and Appointment Committee, cum
                  Principal District and Sessions Judge, Judges Court Road, Civil Court,
                  Patna.
             4.   The Learned District and Sessions Judge, Gaya.

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :      None
                  For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Standing Counsel (22)
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                        ORAL ORDER

3   02-04-2026                      No one appears on behalf of the petitioner.

                    However, learned Counsel for the State and learned Counsel for

                    respondent Nos.2 to 4 are present.

                                2. Though no one appears on behalf of the petitioner

                    but from the mentioning slip a request has been made for

                    withdrawal of the writ petition.

                                3. As such, this writ application is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.

                                                                  (Dr. Anshuman, J)
    Mkr./-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.