Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Upendra Nath VermaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The court disposed of the application as withdrawn, granting the petitioner’s request to withdraw the writ petition.

Summary

The petitioner, Upendra Nath Verma, filed a writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 28 January 2022 that returned his service to his parent department without his consent, allegedly violating State Government decisions dated 22 January 2019 and 6 January 2022. The petition alleged that the respondent department acted contrary to those decisions by reverting his transfer. During the hearing on 12 May 2026, the petitioner’s counsel requested permission to withdraw the application. The court considered the procedural propriety of allowing a withdrawal of a pending writ petition. No merits of the original relief were examined as the petition was voluntarily withdrawn. Consequently, the court disposed of the application as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition seeking quashing of an administrative order can be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • service transfer
  • withdrawal of petition
  • quashing order
  • administrative law
  • Patna High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2861 of 2022
                 ======================================================
                 Upendra Nath Verma Son of Late Motilal Singh resident of House No. F/16,
                 Ashiyana Nagar, Phase- 2, P.S.- Rajeev Nagar, District- Patna.

                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar
           2.    Principal Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection Department, Old
                 Secretariat, Patna.
           3.    Secretary, Co-operative Societies, New Secretariat, Patna.
           4.    Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, New Secretariat, Patna.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Ms. Trisha, Advocate
                                               Mr. Pratap Sharma, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Uday Shankar Sharan Singh (GP-19)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY
                                       ORAL ORDER

4   12-05-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                 2. The petitioner has filed the instant application for

                   the following relief(s):

                                                             “That this writ petition is
                                                being     filed   for    issuance      of    an
                                                appropriate writ/writs, order/orders,
                                                direction/directions for quashing the
                                                order dated 28.01.2022 whereby and
                                                whereunder by violating the State
                                                Government              decision         dated
                                                22.01.2019        and     06.01.2022        the
                                                respondent No.3 has returned back the
                                                service of the petitioner to his parent
                                                department without the consent of
           Patna High Court CWJC No.2861 of 2022(4) dt.12-05-2026
                                                       2/2




                                                     concerned        department     where     the
                                                     service of petitioner was transferred
                                                     in      the    light   of   decision    dated
                                                     22.01.2019 and for other necessary
                                                     relief/reliefs on the basis of facts and
                                                     circumstances of the case.”

                                 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                     to withdraw this application.

                                 4. In view of the above, the application is disposed off

                     as withdrawn.



                                                (Partha Sarthy, J)
sauravkrsinha/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.