Patna High Court
Md. MerajversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
- Bench
- ALOK KUMAR SINHA
Holding
The Court held that a writ petition may be withdrawn at the petitioner's request, subject to the respondent's consent, and liberty may be granted to approach the appropriate authority.
Summary
Md. Meraj filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and several education officials. The petitioner later sought to withdraw the writ application, requesting liberty to approach the appropriate authority for redress. The respondent State raised no objection to the withdrawal. The Court considered whether a writ petition can be withdrawn at the petitioner's request and whether liberty can be granted for alternative redress. Finding no impediment, the Court allowed the withdrawal and granted the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate authority. The writ application was consequently disposed of as withdrawn.
Issues considered
- Whether a writ petition may be withdrawn after filing
- Whether the Court can grant liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate authority for redress
Subjects
- writ petition
- withdrawal
- civil procedure
- high court
- jurisdiction
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2901 of 2026
======================================================
Md. Meraj Son of Md. Taimullah, Resident of the Village and P.O.-Manain,
P.S.-Sahebganj in the district of Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of
Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Director, Primary Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Regional Deputy Director, Department of Education, Tirhut Division,
Muzaffarpur.
4. The District Magistrate, Muzaffarpur.
5. The District Education Officer, Muzaffarpur.
6. The District Education Officer (Establishment), Muzaffarpur.
7. The District Education Officer (Literacy), Muzaffarpur.
8. The Block Education Officer at Sahebganj in the District Muzaffarpur.
9. The District Appellate Authority (Education), Muzaffarpur.
... ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr.Shiv Shankar Prasad Yadav, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr.Government Pleader (05)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
ORAL ORDER
2 16-03-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the
learned counsel appearing for the respondent-State.
2. After advancing some argument, the learned
counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present writ
application with liberty to approach the appropriate authority
for redressal of his grievances.
3. The learned counsel, appearing for the respondent-
State, has no objection to the aforesaid prayer being made by the
learned counsel for the petitioner.
Patna High Court CWJC No.2901 of 2026(2) dt.16-03-2026
2/2
4. As prayed for by the learned counsel for the
petitioner, this writ application is disposed of as withdrawn
granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the appropriate
authority for redressal of his grievances.
(Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
HR/-
U
Checking your session…