Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Nagendra SahaniversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

The petitioner, Nagendra Sahani, filed a writ petition seeking the quashing of a 1982 land purchase order and subsequent letters issued by various officials of the Bihar government concerning the allotment of land for rehabilitation under the Bagmati Project. The petition alleged that the purchase and allotment were illegal, arbitrary, and made without proper enquiry, and also sought a declaration of malafide conduct by the Circle Officer. After hearing, the petitioner’s counsel requested to withdraw the petition to pursue alternative remedies. The court granted liberty to withdraw and dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, without addressing the merits of the claims.

Issues considered

  • The legality of the purchase order dated 27-04-1982 for land allotted for rehabilitation.
  • The legality of Letter No. 1231 dated 24.09.2025 issued by the Circle Officer concerning the same land.
  • The validity of the land allotment in Letter No. 738 dated 16.05.2025 in favour of the petitioner.
  • Whether the actions of the Circle Officer were arbitrary, malafide and liable for prosecution under service rules and the BNS, 2023.
  • The jurisdiction of the Circle Officer to issue the contested letters.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • land acquisition
  • rehabilitation
  • writ petition
  • quashing order
  • administrative law
  • service rules
  • jurisdiction
  • Bihar
  • Bagmati Project

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                              Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2946 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 Nagendra Sahani Son of Late Dukha Sahani, Resident of Village-
                 Madhuchapra, P.O.- Jamuna, Police Station- Bairgania, District- Sitamarhi.

                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Water Resources,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Revenue and Land Reforms,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           4.    The Additional Chief Secretary, Department of General Administration,
                 Government of Bihar, Patna.
           5.    The Joint Secretary, Department of Water Resources Government of Bihar,
                 Patna.
           6.    The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.
           7.    The Superintendent of Police, Sitamarhi.
           8.    The Sub-Divisional Officer, Sadar, Sitamarhi.
           9.    The Deputy Collector Land Reforms, Sadar, Sitamarhi.
           10. The Circle Officer, Bairgania, District- Sitamarhi.
           11. The Executive Engineer, Bagmati Project-cum-Rehabilitation Officer,
               Bagmati Project, Sitamarhi.
           12. The Sub Divisional Officer, Baghmati Sub Division No.4, Bagmati Nagar,
               Sitamarhi.
           13. The Station House Officer, Police Station- Bairgania, District- Sitamarhi.
           14. Jai Kishor Prasad, Son of Late Jagat Narayan Prasad @ Jagat Narayan Sah,
               Resident of Mohalla- Nuniya Toli, Main Road, Near of Mandal Nagar, Ward
               No.5, Chakmahita, Police Station and District- Sitamarhi.
           15. Hari Kishore Prasad, Son of Late Jagat Narayan Prasad @ Jagat Narayan
               Sah, Resident of Mohalla- Nuniya Toli, Main Road, Near of Mandal Nagar,
               Ward No.5, Chakmahita, Police Station and District- Sitamarhi.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Suresh Prasad Bhakta, Adv.
                 For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. Standing Counsel (16)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   27-04-2026                  Heard the parties.

                               2. The present application has been preferred for the
Patna High Court CWJC No.2946 of 2026(3) dt.27-04-2026
                                            2/4




          following relief(s):

                                              (i) for issuance of an appropriate
                                 writ for quashing the purcha dated 1982/
                                 27.04.1982 thereunder alleged to be allotted
                                 21 decimals land bearing Plot (Chak) No. 60
                                 and 61 of Khesra No. 3764 under Khata No.
                                 319 situated at MauzaJamua, Thana No. 84,
                                 District Sitamarhi in the year 1978 for
                                 rehabilitation          in   favour   of   father   of
                                 respondent No. 14 and 15 namely Jagat
                                 Narayan Prasad @ Jagat Narayan Sah
                                 being head of displaced family of Bagmati
                                 Project by the Sub Divisional Officer,
                                 Bagmati Project, Sitamarhi.
                                              (ii) For issuance of an appropriate
                                 writ for quashing the letter No. 1231 dated
                                 24.09.2025 (Annexure-P/16) issued by the
                                 respondent         Circle      Officer,    Bairgania,
                                 Sitamarhi thereunder held that the purcha of
                                 the land bearing Plot No. 3764 under Khata
                                 No. 319 of MauzaJamua Thana No. 84 a5rea
                                 10 decimals is issued without enquiry of
                                 possession as the Purcha of the same is/was
                                 already been issued in favour of respondent
                                 Jay Kishore Prasad which is verified in
                                 proceeding U/s 145 Cr. P. C. in Case No.
                                 01/2024 (Annexure-P/17) by the respondent
                                 No. 8.
                                              (iii) This Hon'ble Court may
                                 adjudicate and hold that the land allotment
Patna High Court CWJC No.2946 of 2026(3) dt.27-04-2026
                                            3/4




                                 Purcha contained in letter No. 738 Sitamarhi
                                 dated 16.05.2025 (Annexure-P/9) issued by
                                 the Respondent No. 11 in favour of the
                                 petitioner and his brother is legal, valid and
                                 justified at all and they (allottees) are
                                 entitled      to    get    possession     over    the
                                 settled/allotted        land   whose    details   are
                                 mentioned in Paragraph No. 19 of this writ
                                 application.
                                              (iv) This Hon'ble Court may
                                 further adjudicate and hold that the entire
                                 actions of Sri Ranjeet Kumar, the Circle
                                 Officer, Bairgania, District Sitamarhi in this
                                 matter is arbitrary in nature and malafide
                                 and is liable to be prosecuted under relevant
                                 service rules applicable to him and under the
                                 relevant provisions of the BNS, 2023.
                                              (v) This Hon'ble Court may further
                                 adjudicate and hold that the letter No. 1231
                                 dated 24.09.2025 (Annexure-P/16) issued by
                                 the respondent No. 10 the Circle Officer,
                                 Bairgania, District - Sitamarhi is illegal and
                                 without jurisdiction in the light of the
                                 clarification as contained in Letter No. 1321
                                 Sitamarhi dated 20.09.2024 (Annexure-P/14)
                                 issued by the competent authority i.e.
                                 respondent No.11 the Executive Engineer-
                                 cum-Rehabilitation Officer) thereunder the
                                 respondent Circle Officer, Bairgania, District
                                 Sitamarhi is/was informed that land in
           Patna High Court CWJC No.2946 of 2026(3) dt.27-04-2026
                                                       4/4




                                            question has not been settled with the private
                                            respondents and their father in response to
                                            Letter     No.     1291   dated   23.08.2024
                                            (Annexure-P/13).
                                 3.    After some argument, learned counsel for the

                     petitioner prays for withdrawal of the petition to pursue

                     alternate remedy available under the law of the land.

                                 4. Granting said liberty, the CWJC No. 2946 of 2026

                     is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                                   (Rajiv Roy, J)
Vijay Singh/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.