Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Veena Kumari GuptaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The petition is dismissed as non‑maintainable due to the non‑joinder of the selected candidates.

Summary

The petitioner, Veena Kumari Gupta, applied for a contractual ANM post under Advertisement No.05/2021 and was shortlisted after the computer‑based test with 44.90 marks, exceeding the category cutoff of 44.19. Despite her shortlisting, her name did not appear in the final merit list published in 2022. She filed representations and an RTI application seeking inclusion in the selection list and related benefits, but received no action. The State contended that the selection process was already concluded, vacancies had been carried forward, and the petitioner had not impleaded the already‑selected candidates as parties. The High Court, after reviewing the records, found that all recommended candidates had joined and the petition lacked necessary joinder of parties, rendering it non‑maintainable. Accordingly, the writ petition was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether a writ petition seeking declaration of selection and appointment is maintainable when the petitioner has not impleaded the already‑selected candidates as parties.
  • Whether the court can direct appointment after the final merit list has been published and the selection process concluded.

Subjects

  • recruitment
  • selection process
  • merit list
  • writ petition
  • non‑joinder of parties
  • RTI
  • administrative law
  • appointment

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3016 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 Veena Kumari Gupta Wife of Manoj Kumar Gupta, resident of Village and
                 Post- Soharthi, P.S.- Jandaha, District-Vaishali- 844505.

                                                                         ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                 Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health
                 and Family Welfare, Government of Bihar, Vikas Bhawan, Patna- 800001.
           2.    The Executive Director, State Health Society Bihar, Parivar Kalyan Bhawan,
                 Sheikhpura, Patna - 800014.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :         Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ Maurya, Advocate
                 For the State          :         Mr. Advocate General
                 For Res. No.2          :         Mr. K.K. Sinha, Advocate
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   20-04-2026                  Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

                                2. The petitioner has filed the instant writ petition for

                   the following reliefs:

                                                        “I. To declare the petitioner as a
                                            successful candidate and include her name in the
                                            final selection list, and issue posting/joining order
                                            with all consequential benefits (including notional
                                            seniority and honorarium from the date candidates
                                            of her merit were appointed.
                                                        II. Directing the respondents to furnish
                                            complete information/reply to the petitioner’s RTI
                                            application within a time-bound period and consider
                                            her representation.”
                                3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that

                   pursuant to Advertisement No.05/2021 for recruitment to 8853

                   contractual posts of A.N.M. under the National Health Mission,
Patna High Court CWJC No.3016 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026
                                            2/3




          the petitioner being eligible applied for the said post. Admit

          Card was issued to the petitioner and date of examination was

          fixed as 21.10.2021, but on the said date, the examination was

          not conducted. Subsequently, on 25.10.2021 and 26.10.2021, the

          Computer Based Test for A.N.M. posts was conducted and in

          the said examination, the petitioner appeared and was shortlisted

          for document verification/counselling. The name of the

          petitioner appeared at Serial No.2926 of the candidates, who

          were shortlisted for counselling, however when the final merit

          list was published, the name of the petitioner was not found

          there, although she had secured 44.90 marks under the Most

          Backward Female Category candidate. It is submitted by the

          learned counsel for the petitioner that the cut off marks in the

          said category is 44.19 and although the petitioner had secured

          44.90 marks, even then she was not selected. The petitioner kept

          on filing representation and R.T.I. application before the

          authorities concerned, but no action has been taken.

                      4. Per contra, the learned counsel appearing on behalf

          of the Bihar Health Society and the State of Bihar submit that

          the selection process already came to an end after publication of

          the merit list in 2022 itself and now in 2026, the petitioner has

          filed the present writ petition and that too without impleading
           Patna High Court CWJC No.3016 of 2026(2) dt.20-04-2026
                                                       3/3




                     any of the selected candidates from her category. Further, the

                     vacancies have been carried forward and, at this stage, it is not

                     possible for the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the said

                     post.

                                 5. Having heard the rival submissions and after going

                     through the records, it appears that the final merit list was

                     published in 2022 and all the recommended candidates have

                     already joined. The petitioner has not impleaded any of the

                     selected candidates in her category as a party-respondent,

                     therefore, the writ petition is not maintainable on account of

                     non-joinder of parties and is accordingly, dismissed.


                                                (Ritesh Kumar, J.)

Sanjay/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.