Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Ashish Kumar JhaversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court held that the petitioner is permitted to withdraw the writ and file an application under Rule 12A for release of the vehicle upon payment of the prescribed penalty.

Summary

The petitioner, Ashish Kumar Jha, filed a writ application challenging the seizure of his vehicle under a confiscation case. He sought to withdraw the writ and instead file an application under Rule 12A of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021 for release of the vehicle upon payment of a penalty. The State, represented by the Additional Advocate General, raised no objection to this request. The Court granted the petitioner liberty to file the appropriate application before the Collector or an authorized officer within 30 days, and directed that the competent authority dispose of it within one month. Consequently, the writ application was disposed of in accordance with the Court’s directions.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the writ application and seek relief for release of the seized vehicle under Rule 12A of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021.

Legislation cited

Subjects

  • writ jurisdiction
  • withdrawal of writ
  • vehicle seizure
  • confiscation
  • Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules
  • Rule 12A
  • penalty
  • excise law

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3132 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 Ashish Kumar Jha Son of Prem Kumar Jha, Resident of village- Barahi, P.S.-
                 Nauhatta, District- Saharsa
                                                                              ... ... Petitioner
                                                    Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Prohibition, Excise and
                  Registration Department Govt, Bihar Patna.
           2.    The Commissioner, Bihar Prohibition and Excise Department Government
                 of Bihar Patna.
           3.    The Commissioner Koshi Division Saharsa.
           4.    The District Magistrate, Saharsa.
           5.    The Superintendent of Police, Saharsa.
           6.    The Excise Superintendent, Saharsa.
           7.    The District Transport Officer, Saharsa.
           8.     The SHO Saharsa Sadar police Station Saharsa District- Saharsa
                                                                           ... ... Respondents
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner     :       Mr. Amarnath Jha, Advocate
                 For the State          :       Mr. S. Raza Ahmad, Addl. Advocate General (05)
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KUMAR MANISH
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD)

3   16-06-2026                  Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned

                   AAG-5 for the State.

                                2. Having regard to the specific averment in the

                   counter affidavit that a Confiscation Case No. 107/2026 has been

                   lodged for confiscation of the vehicle and summon has been

                   served upon the petitioner on 16.03.2026, learned counsel for the

                   petitioner requests this Court to allow him to withdraw the writ

                   application with liberty to file an appropriate application in the
          Patna High Court CWJC No.3132 of 2026(3) dt.16-06-2026
                                                      2/2




                    given format before the Collector or an officer authorized by him

                    for release of the vehicle on payment of penalty.

                                3. Learned AAG-5 for the State has no objection to the

                    said prayer.

                                4. In the circumstances, we grant liberty to the

                    petitioner to file an appropriate application in the given format

                    before the Collector or an officer authorized by him in terms of

                    Rule 12A of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021 (as

                    amended up to date) seeking release of the vehicle in question on

                    payment of penalty. If any such application is filed within a

                    period of 30 days from today, the same will be considered and

                    disposed of by the competent authority i.e. the Collector or an

                    officer authorized by him within a period of one month from the

                    date of filing of the application. The petitioner will be at liberty

                    to place the judicial pronouncements on the subject at the time of

                    hearing of the matter before the competent authority.

                                5. This writ application stands disposed of accordingly.



                                         (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)


                                               (Kumar Manish, J)
lekhi/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.