Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Anand KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Petitioner Anand Kumar filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar, the Union of India, the District Magistrate and an Employment Exchange Officer. During the hearing on 10 March 2026, the petitioner’s counsel sought permission to withdraw the application. The court granted permission to withdraw. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the petition were examined.

Issues considered

  • Whether a civil writ petition may be withdrawn by the petitioner after filing

Subjects

  • withdrawal of writ
  • civil writ jurisdiction
  • petition dismissed

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3165 of 2026
                  ======================================================
                  Anand Kumar Son of Rajendra Paswan, Resident of Village and P.S.-
                  Athmalgola, District- Patna (Bihar).

                                                                            ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus

             1.   The State of Bihar through the Commissioner, Excise and Tax Services,
                  Bihar, Patna.
             2.   The Union of India through the Commissioner, Central Excise and Tax
                  Services, Income Tax Building, Patna.
             3.   The District Magistrate, Patna.
             4.    The Employment Exchange Officer, Niyozan Bhavan, Bailey Road, Dist-
                   Patna, Patna.
                                                                    ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Advocate
                  For the Respondent/s   :      Mr. S.D. Yadav, AAG-9
                                                Mr. Braj Bhushan Mishra, AC to AAG-9
                  For respondent No.4    :      Mr. Sanjay Kumar, C.G.C.
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DR. ANSHUMAN
                                        ORAL ORDER

2   10-03-2026                  Learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Counsel

                    for respondent No.4 and learned counsel for the State are

                    present.

                                2. After some argument, learned counsel for the

                    petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this application.

                                3. Permission is accorded.

                                4. This writ application is dismissed as withdrawn.


                                                                (Dr. Anshuman, J)
    Mkr./-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.