Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Rajnish KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISMISSED

Holding

The petition is not maintainable as it raises disputed facts and constitutes a public interest litigation, and is therefore dismissed.

Summary

The petitioner, a farmer named Rajnish Kumar, filed a writ petition alleging massive fraud and misappropriation of funds under the Chief Minister Crop Assistance Scheme in Juafar Panchayat, East Champaran, and sought directions for an independent investigation, suspension of payments, and remedial guidelines. The court noted that the petitioner had already been compensated for his own crop loss and that other aggrieved persons had not approached the court, having alternative remedies. It observed that the allegations involved complex factual disputes requiring evidence collection and witness examination. The bench held that such matters are not suitable for adjudication through a writ petition and characterized the case as a public interest litigation lacking maintainability. Consequently, the petition was dismissed.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition is maintainable given that it raises disputed factual questions and is essentially a public interest litigation.
  • Whether the court can direct an independent investigation or order suspension of payments under the Crop Assistance Scheme.
  • Whether the petitioner has locus standi to seek relief on behalf of other affected persons.

Subjects

  • public interest litigation
  • writ petition
  • corruption
  • crop assistance scheme
  • misappropriation of funds
  • locus standi
  • jurisdiction

Judgment

                     IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3226 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 Rajnish Kumar Son of Ashish Kumar, Resident of Village- Jainagar, P.O.-
                 Jaufar, P.S.- Chhauradano, District- East Champaran, Bihar- 845302.
                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                      Versus
           1.     The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Secretary, Co-operative Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           3.    The Secretary, Agriculture Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.
           4.    The District Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari.
           5.    The District Cooperative Officer, East Champaran.
           6.    The Block Development Officer, Chhuradano, East Champaran.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr. Ravi Raj, Adv.
                 For the Respondent/s   :       Mr. P.K. Verma, AAG-3
                                                Mr. Sanjay Kumar Ghosarvey, Adv.
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                         and
                         HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR
                                       ORAL ORDER

                 (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

2   02-04-2026                 This instant writ petition has been filed by the

                   petitioner, Rajnish Kumar, seeking the following relief(s):

                                              “i. To issue an appropriate writ,
                                  order or direction directing the respondent
                                  authorities to ensure protection of public funds
                                  and to prevent large-scale corruption, fraud,
                                  and misuse of government money under the
                                  Chief Minister Crop Assistance Scheme in
                                  Juafar Panchayat, Chhauradano Block, District
                                  East Champaran, State of Bihar.
                                              ii. Issue an appropriate writ/order
Patna High Court CWJC No.3226 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026
                                            2/4




                         directing an independent investigation by an
                         agency          such            as         the     Vigilance
                         Bureau/CBI/Special Investigation Team into the
                         scam under the Chief Minister Crop Assistance
                         Scheme for the year 2024-25 in Panchayat
                         Juafar, Block Chhauradano, District East
                         Champaran.
                                      iii. To direct the respondents to
                         immediately stop further payment under the
                         said scheme for the year 2024-25 in the said
                         area till completion of investigation and also to
                         initiate     the     departmental            and   criminal
                         proceedings against erring officials, agents,
                         and        beneficiaries             and     recovery     of
                         misappropriated public money from the guilty
                         persons.
                                      iv. To direct framing of guidelines to
                         prevent future misuse of the scheme.
                                      v. Pass any other order(s) as this
                         Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the
                         interest of justice.”

                      2. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is that large-

          scale fraud has been committed under the Chief Minister Crop

          Assistance Scheme in Panchayat Juafar, Block Chhauradano,

          District East Champaran, during the period 2022–2023 to 2024–

          2025. It is alleged that fake beneficiary details, forged land

          records (Khesra), incorrect land area particulars, and fabricated
Patna High Court CWJC No.3226 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026
                                            3/4




          signatures of public representatives were used to illegally obtain

          government assistance. It is further alleged that public funds

          have been misappropriated through a criminal nexus involving

          CSC/CSP operators, middlemen/agents, local officials, and

          district-level authorities, resulting in siphoning off nearly 75%

          of the scheme amount.

                      3. Upon perusal of the averments made in the writ

          petition, and on a specific query being put to the learned counsel

          for the petitioner regarding the status of the petitioner, it has

          been submitted that the petitioner himself is a farmer who had

          suffered crop loss and has already been duly compensated.

                      4. Although certain individuals have been named in

          the writ petition alleging that they suffered crop loss but were

          not duly compensated, such persons have not approached this

          Court. They have an efficacious alternative remedy to approach

          the competent authority for redressal of their grievances.

                      5. This Court is of the considered view that the issues

          raised in the present writ petition involve disputed questions of

          fact, requiring detailed inquiry, collection of evidence, and

          examination        of    witnesses       to    ascertain   whether   any

          misappropriation of funds has, in fact, taken place.

                      6. In such circumstances, and particularly in view of
          Patna High Court CWJC No.3226 of 2026(2) dt.02-04-2026
                                                      4/4




                    the fact that the affected persons themselves have not

                    approached this Court, we are of the opinion that the present

                    Public Interest Litigation appears to be in the nature of a

                    publicity interest litigation.

                                7. Accordingly, we are not inclined to entertain the

                    present writ petition. The same is, therefore, dismissed.



                                        (Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)


                                               ( Harish Kumar, J)
rohit/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.