Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Manindra KumarversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Manindra Kumar filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and the Bihar Public Service Commission. During the proceedings, the petitioner, through his counsel, sought the Court's permission to withdraw the petition. The Court examined the request and, finding no objection, granted permission for withdrawal. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn. No substantive merits of the original petition were adjudicated.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to withdraw a civil writ petition after filing

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3344 of 2020
                  ======================================================
                  Manindra Kumar Son of Sri Ram Vriksh Ray, Resident of Village-
                  Mirnagar,P.S. Sarai, District- Vaishali.

                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
             1.   The State of Bihar through the Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
             2.   The Bihar Public Service Commission through its Chairman.
             3.   The Chairman, The Bihar Public Service Commission
             4.   The Joint Secretary-Cum-Examination Controller, The Bihar Public Service
                  Commission
             5.   The D.G. Vigilance, Vigilance Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr.Uday Prasad Singh, Advocate
                  For the Respondent/s   :       Mr.Sheo Shankar Prasad (Sc8)
                  For BPSC               :       Mr. Kaushal Kumar Jha, Sr. Advocate
                                                 Mr. Amish Kumar, Advocate
                                                 Mr. Satish Kumar Mehta, Advocate
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NANI TAGIA
                                        ORAL ORDER

3   11-03-2026                    Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission

                    to withdraw the writ petition.

                                2. Permission is granted.

                                3. As such, the writ petition is dismissed as

                    withdrawn.



                                                (Nani Tagia, J)
Amrendra/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

Lawyer court records for this case

Associated through the court’s case reference.

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.