Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Mohammad JamilversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The Court held that the petitioner may answer the notice and the competent authority is duty‑bound to take the matter to its logical conclusion.

Summary

The petitioner, Mohammad Jamil, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 06-12-2025 that directed the Additional Land Acquisition Officer to initiate payment of compensation for land acquired for the construction of National Highway‑139W. He also sought to quash a subsequent notice (Memo No. 3034 dated 13-12-2025) requiring him and other named persons to appear before the District Land Acquisition Officer with supporting documents. The State counsel argued that appearance of the named persons would allow the authority to conclude the matter. The Court allowed the petitioner to respond to the notice and directed the competent authority to take the matter to its logical conclusion, without setting aside the compensation order. Consequently, the writ petition was disposed with the observation that the petitioner may answer the notice and the authority must proceed accordingly.

Issues considered

  • Whether the order directing payment of compensation for land acquired for a national highway can be set aside.
  • Whether the notice (Memo No. 3034/2025) directing the petitioner to appear before the acquisition officer can be quashed.
  • Whether the petitioner is obligated to appear before the authority for compensation proceedings.

Subjects

  • Land acquisition
  • Compensation
  • National Highway 139W
  • Writ petition
  • Setting aside order
  • Quashing notice
  • District Land Acquisition Officer

Judgment

         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                   Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3735 of 2026
     ======================================================
     Mohammad Jamil S/o Late Mohammad Nijamuddin, Resident of Village-
     Brahmpura, P.O.- Bakhra, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur.

                                                                 ... ... Petitioner/s
                                        Versus
1.   The State of Bihar through the District Collector, Muzaffarpur.
2.   The District Collector, Muzaffarpur.
3.   The Competent Authority cum District Land Acquisition Officer,
     Muzaffarpur.
4.   The Additional Land Acquisition Officer, Muzaffarpur.
5.   Md. Ahmad Hussain, S/o Late Md. Sakir, R/o Village- Deoriya, P.S.-
     Deoriya, District- Muzaffarpur.
6.   Adam Hussain @ Adam Ali, S/o Late Md. Sakir, R/o Village- Deoriya, P.S.-
     Deoriya, District- Muzaffarpur.
7.   Md. Yakub @ Yakub Ali, S/o Late Md. Sakir, R/o Village- Deoriya, P.S.-
     Deoriya, District- Muzaffarpur.
8.   Sabujan, W/o Md. Rafiq, D/o Late Md. Sakir, R/o Village- Deoriya, P.S.-
     Deoriya, District- Muzaffarpur.
9.   Rabujan, W/o Md. Sikandar, D/o Late Md. Sakir, Resident of Village-
     Tirkauliya, P.S.- Saraiya, District- Muzaffarpur.
10. Sayara Khatoon, W/o Md. Mahmood, D/o Late Md. Sakir, Resident of
    Village- Gijas, P.S.- Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur.
11. Md. Jahid, S/o Late Md. Salim, R/o Village- Deoriya, P.S.- Deoriya, District-
    Muzaffarpur.
12. Md. Jahur, S/o Late Md. Salim, R/o Village- Deoriya, P.S.- Deoriya,
    District- Muzaffarpur.
13. Md. Jabir, S/o Late Md. Salim, R/o Village- Deoriya, P.S.- Deoriya, District-
    Muzaffarpur.
14. Sajra, W/o Md. Rahmat Ali, D/o Late Md. Salim, R/o Village- Belkathi,
    Jagdishpur, P.S.- Deoriya, District Muzaffarpur.
15. Bibi Hajra, W/o Md. Anwar Ali, D/o Late Md. Salim, R/o Village- Bara
    Khursida, P.S.- Sahebganj, District- Muzaffarpur.
16. Bibi Baua, W/o Md. Naushad, D/o Late Md. Salim, R/o Village- Motipur,
    P.S.- Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur.
17. Akhtar Ali, S/o Md. Sarif, R/o Village- Deoriya, P.S.- Deoriya, District-
    Muzaffarpur.

                                               ... ... Respondent/s
     ======================================================
     Appearance :
     For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr.Dhurendra Kumar, Advocate
     For the Respondent/s   :       Mr.Government Pleader (27)
         Patna High Court CWJC No.3735 of 2026(2) dt.24-03-2026
                                                     2/4




                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   24-03-2026                 Heard the parties.

                               2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   following relief/s:

                                           (i) for setting aside the order dated

                                           06.12.2025        passed          by   District   Land

                                           Acquisition                 Officer,      Muzaffarpur

                                           (Respondent No. 3) in Case No. 09/24 by

                                           which he directed the Additional Land

                                           Acquisition                 Officer,      Muzaffarpur

                                           (Respondent No.4) to take Initiative for

                                           payment of compensation of land of Khata

                                           No.-2747, Kheara No. 16117, Acquired aren

                                           0.7689195 Hectare of Mauza Deoriya,

                                           Thana No.-133, Anchal- Paroo, District-

                                           Muzafarpor doly Bequired by NHAT for

                                           construction           of     N.1-130W      (Manikpur

                                           Sahebganj);

                                           (ii) for quashing the subsequent notice

                                           contained in Memo No. 3034/ Hkq vtZu dated

                                           13.12.25 in LA. Cane No. 01/2020-21 issued

                                           under the signature of competent authority
Patna High Court CWJC No.3735 of 2026(2) dt.24-03-2026
                                            3/4




                                  cum District Land Acquisition Officer,

                                  Muzaffarpur by which he directed the parties

                                  concerned to appear before the District

                                  Land Acquisition Officer, Muzaffarpur with

                                  relevant documents so that payment of

                                  compensation could be made;

                                  (iii) for any other relief(s) for which the

                                  petitioner is found to be entitled in the facts

                                  and circumstances of the case.

                       3. A notice has been issued by the office of the

          Collector, Muzaffarpur in Land Acquisition Case No. 01 of

          2020-21 relating to National Highway-139W Manikpur,

          Sahebganj for lane road construction. The said memo no. 3034

          dated 13.12.2025 has been issued by the competent authority

          cum District Land Acquisition Officer, Muzaffarpur.

                       4. Amongst other the name of the petitioner is there,

          and request has been made to appear alongwith all the

          supporting documents to lay claim/receive compensation.

                       5. After some argument, learned counsel for the

          petitioner submits that he shall be replying to the said

          notice/appearing before the authority concerned.

                       6. Learned State counsel submits that if he/the other
         Patna High Court CWJC No.3735 of 2026(2) dt.24-03-2026
                                                     4/4




                   named persons appear, the authority shall be taking the matter to

                   its logical conclusion.

                                7. In that background, the writ petition is disposed of

                   allowing the petitioner to answer to the notice vide memo no.

                   3034 dated 13.12.2026(Annexure-6 to the petition) and the

                   competent authority shall be duty bound to take the matter to its

                   logical conclusion.

                                8. The writ petition stands disposed of with the

                   aforesaid observation.



                                                 (Rajiv Roy, J)
Ravi/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.