Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Dev Narayan Singh @ Deo Narayan SinghversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

Mere institution of an FIR does not constitute a valid ground for cancellation of a PDS licence under the applicable statutory framework.

Summary

The petitioner, Dev Narayan Singh, challenged the cancellation of his PDS licence (No. 396/2016) by the Sub‑Divisional Licensing Authority, which was based solely on an FIR lodged against him. He also contested the subsequent appellate and revisional orders that upheld the cancellation, seeking certiorari and mandamus to restore his licence and supplies. The High Court examined the PDS (Control) Order, 2001 and the G.S.R. No.1 notification of 20‑02‑2007, holding that the mere institution of an FIR does not constitute a valid ground for licence cancellation. Relying on the precedent set in Umesh Ram v. State of Bihar, the Court quashed the cancellation order and set aside the appellate and revisional orders, directing that supplies be restored immediately. The Court clarified that if the petitioner is later convicted in the criminal case, appropriate action may be taken thereafter.

Issues considered

  • Whether the mere institution of a First Information Report is a valid ground for cancellation of a PDS licence under the PDS (Control) Order, 2001 and G.S.R. No.1 dated 20‑02‑2007.
  • Whether the appellate order dated 01‑04‑2023 and the revisional order dated 11‑02‑2025 are maintainable in view of the alleged procedural deficiencies.
  • Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to compel restoration of the cancelled PDS licence and supply of commodities.

Subjects

  • PDS licence
  • Cancellation
  • First Information Report
  • Certiorari
  • Mandamus
  • Administrative law
  • Bihar Food and Consumer Protection

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                             Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3745 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 Dev Narayan Singh @ Deo Narayan Singh, S/o Late Mithileshwar Singh,
                 Resident of Gosai Tola, Patliputra Colony, Near Mangal Deep Apartment,
                 Boring Road, P.S. S.K. Puri, District-Patna.


                                                                               ... ... Petitioner/s


                                                     Versus


           1.    The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Food and Consumer Protection
                 Department, Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna.
           3.    The District Magistrate cum Collector, Patna.
           4.    The Sub Divisional Officer cum Licensing Authority, Patna Sadar, Patna.
           5.    The Supply Inspector, Ward No. 37 Rationing, Patna.


                                                                             ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :        Mr.Dhananjaya Nath Tiwari, Adv.
                 For the Respondent/s   :        Mr.Government Pleader (6)

                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. ABHISHEK REDDY
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   20-04-2026                   Heard learned counsel for the parties.

                                 2. The present Writ Petition has been filled for the

                   following reliefs:-

                                            “(i) For issuance of appropriate writ/writs,
                                            order/orders, direction/directions in the
                                            nature of certiorari for quashing the order
                                            contained in Memo No. 26/Aa dated
                                            10.01.2022 passed by the Learned Sub-
                                            Division Officer-cum-Licensing authority,
Patna High Court CWJC No.3745 of 2026(3) dt.20-04-2026
                                            2/4




                                 Patna Sadar by which he has cancelled the
                                 license of the petitioner being License No.
                                 396/2016 on the basis of allegation
                                 mentioned in the FIR and further on the basis
                                 of notice where there is no stipulation of
                                 proposed cancellation and that too without
                                 supplying the copy of inspection report.
                                 (ii) For issuance of appropriate writ/writs,
                                 order/orders, direction/directions in the
                                 nature of certiorari for quashing the order
                                 dated 01.04.2023 passed in E.C. Appeal Case
                                 No. 68/2021-22 passed by the Learned
                                 Collector Patna by which he was pleased to
                                 dismiss the Statutory appeal filed on behalf
                                 of the petitioner.
                                 (iii) For issuance of appropriate writ/writs,
                                 order/orders, direction/directions in the
                                 nature of certiorari for quashing the order
                                 dated 11.02.2025 passed in B.T. PDS Control
                                 Revision No. 176/2023 passed by the
                                 Learned Commissioner, Patna Division,
                                 Patna by which he was pleased to dismiss the
                                 Statutory revision filed on behalf of the
                                 petitioner without considering the grounds
                                 raised on behalf of the petitioner.
                                 (iv) For issuance of appropriate writ/writs,
                                 order/orders, direction/directions in the
                                 nature of mandamus commanding the
                                 respondents to restore the license and
                                 allotment of the petitioner being License No.
                                 396/2016.”

                      3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

          solitary ground given in the order dated 10.01.2022 vide Memo

          No. 26 for cancelling the PDS licence of the petitioner was that

          an First Information Report (F.I.R.) bearing Pirbahor P.S. Case
Patna High Court CWJC No.3745 of 2026(3) dt.20-04-2026
                                            3/4




          No. 341 of 2021 had been instituted against the petitioner.

                      4. Learned counsel for the respondents appears and

          has been heard.

                      5. Having heard the parties and on consideration of

          the materials on record, this Court finds merit in the writ

          petition. A perusal of the PDS. (Control) Order, 2001 read with

          Rule 7 of the notification in G.S.R. No. 1 dated 20.02.2007

          makes it clear that mere institution of a First Information Report

          would not constitute a valid ground for cancellation of the PDS

          licence. This view finds support from the decision of this Court

          in Umesh Ram vs. The State of Bihar and others, AIR 2014

          Patna 113 as well.

                      6. In view of the above, the impugned order dated

          10.01.2022 (Annexure-P/6) is hereby quashed and consequently

          the appellate order dated 01.04.2023 (Annexure-P/7) and the

          revisional order dated 11.02.2025 (Annexure P/8) are also set

          aside.

                      7. Needless to say, supplies to the petitioner shall be

          restored without delay.

                      8. It is made clear that, in case, the petitioner is

          subsequently convicted in the criminal case instituted against

          him, thereafter, the authorities are free to take necessary action
             Patna High Court CWJC No.3745 of 2026(3) dt.20-04-2026
                                                         4/4




                       in accordance with law.

                                   9. With the above directions, the Writ Petition stands

                       allowed to the extent indicated.



                                                                      (A. Abhishek Reddy , J)
Bhardwaj/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.