Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Lalita SawversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
DISPOSED

Holding

The court dismissed the writ petition, directing the petitioner to approach the District Land Acquisition Officer for compensation and ordering the petition to stand disposed if a fresh petition is filed within eight weeks.

Summary

The petitioner, Lalita Saw, filed a writ petition seeking compensation for land acquired for the widening of NH‑02, for the demolition of her house containing two‑story building, crops and household articles, and for the alleged illegal demolition without prior notice. She claimed loss of land, destruction of the house, and loss of rice, wheat, and other valuables amounting to Rs 2 lacs. The respondents, including the State of Bihar and the District Land Acquisition Officer, were asked to pay appropriate compensation. The court noted that the petitioner could approach the District Land Acquisition Officer for redress and that the State counsel raised no objection. Consequently, the court granted liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition within eight weeks and ordered that the present writ petition stand disposed if such a petition is filed, effectively dismissing the current petition without granting any compensation.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner is entitled to compensation for land acquired for the NH‑02 widening project.
  • Whether compensation is payable for the demolition of the petitioner’s house and loss of crops and household articles.
  • Whether the demolition without prior notice constitutes an illegal act warranting compensation.
  • Whether the court can direct the petitioner to approach the Land Acquisition Officer and dispose of the writ petition pending such approach.

Subjects

  • land acquisition
  • compensation
  • demolition without notice
  • writ petition
  • high court
  • NH‑02
  • agricultural loss

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3875 of 2026
                 ======================================================
                 Lalita Saw S/o Bega Saw Resident of Village- Sinduriya, P.S.- Barun,
                 District- Aurangabad, Bihar.

                                                                             ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                    Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Secretary, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
           2.    The Collector, Aurangabad.
           3.    Presiding Officer cum DCLR, Aurangabad.
           4.    The Land Acquisition Officer, Aurangabad.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :       Mr. Kumar Kaushlendra, Advocate
                                                Mr. Binay Kumar Singh, Advocate
                 For the Respondent/s   :       Mr. Satya Vrat, AC to GP-10
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY
                                       ORAL ORDER

2   30-03-2026                   Heard the parties.

                                 2. The present petition has been preferred for the

                   following relief(s):

                                              “I. For a direction to the respondent

                                    authority specially Respondent No.-4 to pay the

                                    adequate compensation for the land of the

                                    petitioner which was acquired by the N.H.A.I. for

                                    conversion of NH-02 into 6 Lane Road.

                                              II.     For   further     direction     to    the

                                    respondent authority to pay the compensation for

                                    the land including 2 stories building in which the

                                    crops of rice, wheat and boxes of the clothes were
Patna High Court CWJC No.3875 of 2026(2) dt.30-03-2026
                                            2/3




                          kept by the petitioner in the said house, which were

                          also destroyed by the authority while demolition of

                          the said house.

                                      III. For further issuance of a direction to

                          pay the compensation for the illegal act of the

                          authority by which they have destroyed the

                          valuable property of the petitioner without giving

                          any prior information about the demolition of the

                          said house, so that the petitioner could be abled to

                          take away the rice, wheat, paddy and other

                          valuable household articles amounting to rupees 2

                          lacs.

                                      IV. Pass any other order as your

                          lordships may deem fit and proper under the

                          circumstances of the case.”

                      3. After some arguments, learned counsel for the

          petitioner submits that he shall be approaching the respondent

          no. 4, the District Land Acquisition Officer, Aurangabad for the

          redressal of the grievance.

                      4. Learned State counsel has no objection to it.

                      5. In that background, granting liberty to the petitioner

          and expecting the concerned respondent to act in the matter if
          Patna High Court CWJC No.3875 of 2026(2) dt.30-03-2026
                                                      3/3




                    any petition is filed in next eight weeks, the writ petition stands

                    disposed of.



                                                  (Rajiv Roy, J)
Adnan/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.