Patna High Court
Akhilesh KumarversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- DISPOSED
Holding
The High Court held that the petitioner must first avail himself of the remedy under Rule 12A of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021, and therefore the writ cannot be entertained.
Summary
The petitioner, Akhilesh Kumar, sought a writ directing the State of Bihar and its officials to release his seized Honda motorcycle, which was allegedly found with illegal wine. He also requested release upon payment of a penalty. The Court observed that the petitioner had not invoked the statutory remedy provided under Rule 12A of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021, which requires an application to the competent authority for release of seized property. The Court therefore declined to entertain the writ and directed the petitioner to file the appropriate application before the Collector or authorized officer within 30 days. It further instructed that the competent authority consider the quantity of seized liquor and any prior involvement of the petitioner before fixing any penalty. The writ application was dismissed, with liberty granted to the petitioner to pursue the statutory remedy.
Issues considered
- Whether the petitioner can approach the High Court directly for release of a seized vehicle without first invoking the remedy under Rule 12A of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021.
- Whether the High Court has jurisdiction to grant relief in a matter that is expressly covered by a statutory procedure.
Legislation cited
- Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021 — s. Rule 12A
Subjects
- writ jurisdiction
- seizure of vehicle
- excise law
- statutory remedy
- Rule 12A
- penalty assessment
- high court discretion
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4051 of 2026
======================================================
Akhilesh Kumar S/o Ramgilash Turiya, Resident of Village-Ektara, P.O.-
Sughari, P.S.-Nawada, Dist.-Nawada, State-Bihar.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Excise Department,
Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Excise Commissioner, Bihar, Patna.
3. The Collector, Nawada.
4. The Sub Divisional Officer Nawada Sub Division, Dist.-Nawada.
5. The Superintendent of Police, Nawada.
6. The Superintendent of Excise, Nawada.
7. The SHO Excise Govindpur Police Station, Dist.-Nawada, Bihar.
... ... Respondents
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv.
Mr. Pramod Kumar Verma, Adv.
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ravi Ranjan, AC to SC-22
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD
and
HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KUMAR MANISH
ORAL ORDER
(Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD)
3 22-06-2026 Let the counter affidavit of the State be taken on the
record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned
counsel for the State.
3. The petitioner in the present case is seeking the
following reliefs:-
“(i) For issuance of a direction to the
Respondents to release the Honda motorcycle
of the petitioner on bail bearing Registration
No. – JH11AQ2403, Engine No. –
Patna High Court CWJC No.4051 of 2026(3) dt.22-06-2026
2/3
JC94EG0623236, Chassis No. –
ME4JC941DRG167428 which was alleged to
be seized by Police Sub Inspector Govindpur
Thana, Dist. – Nawada carrying illegal wine
in connection with Govindpur P.S. Case No.
305/2025.
(ii) To direct the respondents to release the
motorcycle to the petitioner after payment of
penalty.
(iii) To grant any other reliefs to which the
petitioner may be found entitled in the facts
and circumstances of this case.”
4. On perusal of the writ application, it appears that
the petitioner has not availed the remedy available to him under
Rule 12A of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Rules, 2021 (as
amended up-to-date) (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Rules of
2021’). He has moved directly before this Court in its writ
jurisdiction. We would not encourage the petitioner to avoid the
statutory remedy available to him.
5. This writ application is being disposed of with
liberty to the petitioner to file an appropriate application in the
prescribed format before the Competent Authority i.e the
Collector, Nawada or an officer authorized by him in Form-IV
under Rule 12A of the Rules of 2021 within a period of 30 days
from today. If such an application for the release of the vehicle
Patna High Court CWJC No.4051 of 2026(3) dt.22-06-2026
3/3
is preferred before the Competent Authority, the same shall be
considered and disposed of within a period of another 30 days.
6. Let it be recorded that four Royal Stag bottles of
180 ml, total being 720 ml of foreign made liquor have been
seized from the vehicle in question. Therefore, before fixing the
penalty amount, the Competent Authority shall keep in mind the
quantum of the liquor as also the previous involvement of the
petitioner, if any. It is open to the petitioner to place all the
judicial pronouncements on the subject before the Competent
Authority.
(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J)
( Kumar Manish, J)
Abhishek/-
SUSHMA2/-
U
Checking your session…
Lawyer court records for this case
Associated through the court’s case reference.