Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Raj KamalversusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The petition is disposed of as withdrawn.

Summary

Raj Kamal filed a civil writ petition in the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and various officials. The petitioner, through senior counsel, later sought the Court's permission to withdraw the writ petition. The Court considered the petitioner's request and the procedural propriety of allowing a withdrawal. No substantive issues on the merits were addressed. Accordingly, the Court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the petitioner may withdraw the writ petition pending before the High Court

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • civil procedure
  • high court

Judgment

                         IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                 Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4133 of 2025
                  ======================================================
                  Raj Kamal S/o Tanik Mandal Chaurashia, R/o Mohalla - Ward no. 36,
                  Officers Colony, Chirmiri, Doman Hill, Sonwani Colli, Koriya, Chattisgarh,
                  Police Station Chirmiri, District - Koriya, Chattisgarh 497557, presently
                  residing at Adarsh Lakshmipur, P.S -Barahiya, District - Lakhisarai
                                                                              ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                     Versus

            1.    The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, General Administration
                  Department, Bihar, Patna
            2.    The Additional Secretary, General Administration Department, Bihar, Patna
            3.    The High Court of Judicature at Patna through the Registrar General, Patna
                  High Court
            4.    The Principal District and Sessions Judge, Jamui
            5.    The Registrar, District and Sessions Court, Jamui
                                                            ... ... Respondent/s
                  ======================================================
                  Appearance :
                  For the Petitioner/s    :       Mr. Jitendra Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate
                                                  Mr. Rajeev Kumar, Advocate
                                                  Mr. Venkatesh Kaushik, Advocate
                                                  Mr.Varun Krishna Singh, Advocate
                  For the Respondent/s    :       Mr. Government Advocate (5)
                  ======================================================
                  CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
                          and
                          HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH
                                        ORAL ORDER
                  (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE)

2    21-01-2026              The learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission on

                    behalf of the petitioner to withdraw the writ petition.

                    2.      Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as withdrawn.


                                         (Sangam Kumar Sahoo, CJ)


                                              (Mohit Kumar Shah, J)
kanchan/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.