Created by Fuzzy Cloud

Patna High Court

Pahadiya Commercial Ltd.versusThe State of Bihar

Decided
Disposal
WITHDRAWN

Holding

The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Summary

Pahadiya Commercial Ltd., a registered company, filed a civil writ petition before the Patna High Court challenging actions of the State of Bihar and several officials of the Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority (BIADA). The petition sought relief against the respondents, though the specific relief sought is not detailed in the judgment. During the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the petitioner wished to withdraw the writ application. The respondents' counsel were present, but no further arguments were made. The court, accepting the withdrawal, dismissed the petition as withdrawn.

Issues considered

  • Whether the writ petition should be entertained after the petitioner seeks to withdraw it

Subjects

  • writ petition
  • withdrawal
  • dismissal
  • civil procedure
  • Patna High Court

Judgment

                      IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
                                Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4181 of 2024
                 ======================================================
                 Pahadiya Commercial Ltd. a registered company having its registered office
                 at house of Late Madan Lal Jain, Kankar Bagh, Patna 800020 through its
                 representative namely Yaman Jain male aged about 39 years Son of Binod
                 Kumar Jain, resident of H/o Madan Lal Jain Kankar Bagh Road, Lohia Nagar,
                 Sampatchak, Patna, Bihar - 800020.

                                                                           ... ... Petitioner/s
                                                   Versus
           1.    The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Seretary Department of
                 Industries, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna.
           2.    The Additional Chief Secretary cum Appellate Authority Department of
                 Industries, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Bailey Road, Patna.
           3.    The Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority, Udyogh Bhawan, East
                 Gandhi Maidan, Patna through its Managing Director.
           4.    The Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority,
                 Udyogh Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna.
           5.    The Joint Managing Director, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority,
                 first Floor, Udyogh Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna.
           6.    The Deputy General Manager, Bihar Industrial Area Development Authority,
                 Patna Cluster Udyogh Bhawan, East Gandhi Maidan, Patna.
           7.    The Executive Director, Regional Office, Bihar Industrial Area Development
                 Authority, Patna.
           8.    The District Magistrate, Patna.
           9.    The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.
           10. Mr. Sandeep Poundrik, the Additional Chief Secretary Cum Appellate
               Authority, Department of Industries, Government of Bihar, Patna.

                                                           ... ... Respondent/s
                 ======================================================
                 Appearance :
                 For the Petitioner/s   :      Mr.Gautam Kumar Kejriwal
                                               Mr. Alok Kumar Jha
                 For the Respondent/s   :      Mr.Standing Counsel 20
                 For the BIADA                 Mr. Girijesh Kumar
                 ======================================================
                 CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA
                                       ORAL ORDER

3   17-04-2026                     Learned counsel for the petitioner Mr. Alok Kumar

                   Jha submits that he is under instructions to withdraw the present

                   writ application.
       Patna High Court CWJC No.4181 of 2024(3) dt.17-04-2026
                                                   2/2




                             2. Learned counsel for the respondent-BIADA and the

                 learned counsel for the respondent-State are present.

                             3. As prayed for, the case is dismissed as withdrawn.



                                         (Alok Kumar Sinha, J)
HR/-

U


Continue reading with your account

Sign in to read the full judgment. It’s free.

Sign in to read

Checking your session…

For a signed copy suitable for filing, refer to the court's website.