Patna High Court
Md. YahiyaversusThe State of Bihar
- Decided
- Disposal
- WITHDRAWN
- Bench
- RITESH KUMAR
Holding
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Summary
The petitioners, Md. Yahiya and Kamal Rajak, filed a civil writ petition against the State of Bihar and related officials seeking compensation. During the hearing, the petitioners' counsel requested permission to withdraw the writ petition while reserving the right to pursue compensation separately. The court considered whether such withdrawal could be permitted. It granted the petitioners' request, allowing the withdrawal of the writ petition. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn, leaving the compensation claim to be pursued through other appropriate legal avenues.
Issues considered
- Whether the court may grant permission to withdraw a civil writ petition while allowing the petitioner to seek compensation separately
Subjects
- withdrawal of writ petition
- civil writ jurisdiction
- compensation claim
- state liability
Judgment
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 4247 of 2026
======================================================
1. Md. Yahiya Son of Late Md. Shekh Mohammad Umar, Resident of Village
and P.S. Mohiuddin Nagar, District-Samastipur.
2. Kamal Rajak Son of Late Bigu Rajak, R/o Village-Hasanpur Surat, P.S.
Patori, District- Samastipur.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of
Agriculture, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Agriculture, Government of Bihar,
Patna.
3. The Administrator, Bihar State Agriculture Marketing Board (dissolved),
Pant Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.
4. The Sub-Divisional Officer cum Special Officer, Agriculture Produce
Market Committee (dissolved), Sahpur Patori, District-Samastipur.
.. ... Respondent/s
======================================================
Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Jai Prakash Verma, Advocate
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Government Advocate (7)
======================================================
CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RITESH KUMAR
ORAL ORDER
2 24-03-2026 Heard the parties.
2. At the outset, the learned counsel for the petitioner
seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a
liberty to take appropriate recourse for payment of
compensation from the State Government.
3. The permission, so sought for, is accorded.
4. The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
(Ritesh Kumar, J)
AjayMishra/-
U
Checking your session…